摘要
目的:探讨血清半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(CysC)水平检测对糖尿病早期肾功能损害的诊断意义。方法:将80例I型或2型糖尿病患者按尿白蛋白排泄率(UAER)分为3组,无糖尿病的正常人为1组。A组为20例无糖尿病的正常人。B组为正常蛋白尿患者32例(UAER〈20μg/min);C组为微量蛋白尿患者29例(UAER20-200μg/min);D组为大量蛋白尿患者19例(UAER〉200g/min);同时测定各组血肌酐及Cystatin C,并计算肌酐清除率。结果:血清Cystatin C和CCr在B、C、D三组间的差异有显著性(P〈0.05),而Scr在B组和C组间的差异无显著(P〉0.05),而C组的Scr高于A、B、D组,差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。Cystatin C在A组和B组间比较无显著性差异(P〉0.05);C组、D组与A组、B组比较有显著性差异(P〈0.001)。结论:Cystatin C是临床上诊断早期糖尿病肾病的敏感指标之一。
Objective: To explore the diagnostic significance of serum cystatin C (Cys C) testing in the early Stage renal damage in Diabetes. Methods: According to urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) ,80 cases of type 1 or type 2 diabetic patients were divided into 3 groups,non-diabetic normal for one group. A group was 20 healthy persons without diabetes.B group was 32 cases of patients with normal albuminuria(UAER〈20μg/min) ;C group was 29 cases of patients with microalbuminuria (UAER20-200μg/min);D Group were 19 cases of patients with substantial proteinuria (UAER〉200g/min) ;simultaneously measured serum creatinine and Cystatin C of each group, and calculated creatinine clearance rate. Results: there was a significant difference of serum Cystatin C and CCr among the B, C, D three groups (P〈0.05) ,and Scr has no significant differences between the B group and C group (P〉0.05) ,while Scr of the C group was higher than the A,B,D group,there was a significant difference (P〈 0.05).The comparison of Cystatin C in the A group and B group has no significant difference (P〉0.05) ;and the comparison among C group, D group and A group, B group has significant difference (P〈0.001). Conclusion: Cystatin C is one of the sensitive indicators to diagnosis early stage clinical diabetic nephropathy.
出处
《湖南中医药大学学报》
CAS
2009年第7期3-4,33,共3页
Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine