期刊文献+

低强度脉冲超声波对兔骨髓基质细胞增殖和分化的影响 被引量:2

Effects of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on the proliferation and differentiation of rabbit bone marrow stromal cells
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:研究发现低强度脉冲超声波对骨折愈合具有明显的促进作用,但其机制尚不明确。目的:观察低强度脉冲超声波对体外分离培养的兔骨髓基质细胞增殖和分化的影响。设计、时间及地点:随机分组设计,对比观察,于2008-06/2009-01在解放军第四军医大学西京医院完成。材料:4周龄新西兰白兔2只,体质量0.8~1.0kg,用于骨髓基质细胞的分离、培养。方法:将骨髓基质细胞以2×104个/孔的密度接种于6孔培养板中,采用辐射强度为30mW/cm2的脉冲超声波作用于体外培养的兔骨髓基质细胞,根据低强度脉冲超声波每天作用时间分为4组:5min/d组,10min/d组,20min/d组和空白对照组(无超声波处理)。主要观察指标:原代及传代细胞形态变化;四甲基偶氮唑盐法检测低强度脉冲超声波作用1,3,7d各组细胞吸光度的变化;作用3,7d后各组骨髓基质细胞碱性磷酸酶活性的变化;作用7d各组骨髓基质细胞分泌骨钙素水平的变化。结果:①原代骨髓基质细胞7d后融合成片,多数细胞呈梭形或多角形;第3代细胞经低强度脉冲超声波处理后,各组细胞形态较空白对照组无明显变化。②四甲基偶氮唑盐检测,各组细胞吸光度值均随时间延长而增加;且各实验组不同时间点吸光度值均明显高于空白对照组(P<0.05)。③与空白对照组相比,20min/d组低强度脉冲超声波作用3,7d后,单位质量骨髓基质细胞总蛋白碱性磷酸酶活性均显著升高(P<0.05),其他2组与空白对照组相比,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。④与空白对照组相比,20min/d组低强度脉冲超声波作用7d时,骨髓基质细胞分泌骨钙素显著增加(P<0.05),而其他2组骨钙素的分泌量与空白对照组相比,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论:低强度脉冲超声波能够显著促进兔骨髓基质细胞的增殖,其诱导分化作用与作用时间有关。 BACKGROUND: It was discovered that low intensity of pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) could obviously improve the healing of bone fracture, but the related mechanism was unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biological effects of LIPUS on the proliferation and differentiation of rabbit bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) in vitro. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: A randomized study was performed from June 2008 to January 2009 at the Xijing Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University of Chinese PLA. MATERIALS: Two New Zealand white rabbits, aged 4 weeks old, weighing 0.8 to 1.0 kg, for the isolation and culture of BMSCs. METHODS: BMSCs were incubated in a 6-well plate at 2×10^4 cells/well. LIPUS of 30 mW/cm2 was used to stimulate the cultured rabbit BMSCs. BMSCs were assigned to 4 groups, 5 min/d group, 10 min/d group, 20 min/d group and blank control group (no ultrasonic treatment). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphological changes in primary and subcultured cells were measured. Changes in absorbance in each group were detected at 1, 3 and 7 days following ultrasonic treatment using MTT assay. Alkaline phosphatase activities were determined at 3 and 7 days in each group. Osteocalcin levels secreted from BMSCs were detected in each group at 7 days following treatment. RESULTS: Following 7 days of culture, primary cultured BMSCs were confluent, and most cells were spindle or polygonal. Cells at passage 3 following LIPUS did not change in morphology in 5 min/d group, 10 min/d group, 20 min/d group compared with the blank control group. MTT assay indicated that absorbance was increased in each group over time. Absorbance was significantly greater in the 5 min/d group, 10 min/d group, 20 min/d group compared with the blank control group at various time points (P 〈 0.05). Compared with the blank control group, alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly higher following 3 and 7 days of LIPUS treatment in the 20 min/d group (P 〈 0.05). No significant difference in alkaline phosphatase activities was determined when comparing 5 min/d group, 10 min/d group to the blank control group (P 〉 0.05). Compared with the blank control group, osteocalcin levels were significantly increased in the 20 min/d group following 7 days of LIPUS treatment (P 〈 0.05). No significant difference in osteocalcin levels was determined when comparing 5 min/d group, 10 min/d group to the blank control group (P 〉 0.05). CONCLUSION: The low intensity pulsed ultrasound could stimulate the proliferation of rabbit BMSCs. The cell differentiation-induced effect of LIPUS on BMSC depends on the exposure time.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第36期7043-7046,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Shampo MA, Kyle RA. Karl Theodore Dussik--pioneer in ultrasound. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(12):1136.
  • 2Di Crosta I, Inserra A, Gil CP, et al. Abdominal pain and wandering spleen in young children: the importance of an early diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(7):1446-1449.
  • 3Banal F, Gandjbakhch F, Foltz V, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasonography in Early Diagnosis of Metatarsal Bone Stress Fractures: A Pilot Study of 37 Patients. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jun 30.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 4Griffin XL, Costello I, Costa ML. The role of low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of acute fractures: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1446-1452.
  • 5Claes L, Willie B. The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93(1-3):384-398.
  • 6Khan Y, Laurencin CT. Fracture repair with ultrasound: clinical and cell-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90 Suppl 1 : 138-144.
  • 7李燕如,张长杰.低强度脉冲超声波促进骨折愈合的研究进展[J].中国康复,2008,23(2):123-125. 被引量:8
  • 8Romano CL, Romano D, Logoluso N, Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for the treatment of bone delayed union or nonunion: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(4):529-536.
  • 9Takikawa S, Matsui N, Kokubu T, et all Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound initiates bone healing in rat nonunion fracture model. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 ;20(3):197-205.
  • 10Nolte PA, van der Krans A, Patka P, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of nonunions. J Trauma. 2001 ;51 (4): 693-703.

二级参考文献69

  • 1[1]Ashush H, Rozenszajn LA, Blass M, et al. Apoptosis Induction of Human Myeloid Leukemia Cell by Ultrasound Exposure[J]. Cancer Research, 2000, 60:1014.
  • 2[2]Warden S J, Favaloro J M, Bennell K L, et al. Low - intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates a bone- forming response in UMR106 cells[J] .Biochem - Biophys - Res- Commun, 2001,286(3):443-450.
  • 3[3]Yang K H, Parvtzi J, Wang S J, et al. Exposure to low - intensity ultrasound increeses aggrecan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model[J] .J Orthop Resl, 1996, 14:802.
  • 4[4]Ngbiem D, et al. In vitro effects of therapeutic ultrasound on cell proliferarion, protein synthesis, and cytokine production by human fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and monocytes[J]. J Oral Maxillofoc Surg,1999, 57:409.
  • 5[5]Doan N, Reber P, Megbji S, et al. In Vitro Effect of Therapeutic Ultrasound on Cell Proliferation, Protein Synthesis, and Cytokine Production by Human Fibroblasts, Osteoblasts, and Monocytes [J]. Joral Maxillofcc Surg, 1999, 57: 409.
  • 6[6]Reher P, Elbeshir EI, Harvey W, et al. The Stimulation of Bone Formation In Vitro by Therapeutic Ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound in Med. &. Biol, 1997, 23(8): 1251.
  • 7[7]Tsai CL, Chang WH, Liu TK. Preliminary studtes of duration and intensity of ultrasonic treatments on fracture repair [J]. Chin J Physiol, 1992, 35: 21-26.
  • 8[8]Wang S J, Lewallen DG, Bolander ME, et al. Low intensity ultrasound treatment increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model [J] .J Orthop Res. 1994, 12:40.
  • 9[9]Yang KH, Parvizi J, Wang S - J, et al. Exposure to low - intensity ultrasound increases aggregan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model[J] .J Orthop Res, 1996, 14:802.
  • 10[10]Frenkel V, Kimmel E, Iger Y, et al. Ultrasound - Induced Intercellular Space Widening in Fish[J]. Ultrasound in Med. &. Boil.2000, 26(3) :473.

共引文献724

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部