“意境”阐释何为——与蒋寅先生商榷

What Is "Yijing"'s Interpretation for——Discuss with Mr. Jiang Yin

蒋寅认为,古人使用的"意境"只是立意取境之义,是一个不含价值色彩的中性概念,只是从王国维开始,由于西方艺术理论的启发,意境才成为一个与传统用法割裂的现代诗学范畴。本文对这一看法提出商榷,认为它忽视了20世纪的"意境"阐释同样离不开传统美学诗学的阐释语境。另外,文章还对蒋寅以概念史的清理为名,以"意象"取代"意境"范畴在中国美学史上地位的观点提出批评,认为"意境"作为一个美学诗学范畴被命名,是以民族的诗意审美为基础的,任何关于"意境"的概念史清理都必须以此为前提,否则就会失去它应有的意义。

Jiang Yin consider that the ＂Yijing＂ used by the ancient is a neutral conception with no value, however, it began from Wang Guowei that because of the enlightenment of Western artistic conception, Yijing transformed to a modern poetic conception which is separated pinion, and considers it has ignored that the twentieth of traditional esthetics and poetics. What＇s more, this from the traditional use. This article puts query on this ocentury＇s ＂YiJing＂ still can not be separated from the context article criticizes that Jiang Yin uses the clean off of conceptual history, and uses Yixiang replace the Yijing＇s place in Chinese aesthetic history. This article also consider ＂Yi- jing＂ as a conception in the range of aesthetics and poetics, is on the base of national poetic aesthetic sense, and any conception about ＂Yijing＂ must on this basis, otherwise, it would lose its meaning that it ought to have.