期刊文献+

检察权的谦抑性 被引量:2

On the Modesty and Restraint of the Procuratorial Power
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为"求刑者"的检察机关在刑事司法活动中的权力运作,需要体现谦抑性。其标准是对人的主体性地位的尊重、对公序良俗的参考、宽容和自省等。然而,这并不意味着检察权无原则、无限制地退让,更不意味着检察权对社会生活调节作用的减小。要真正塑造一种以人为本、充满人情味却不失严正的法律监督体系,实现我国检察权在新形势下的谦抑化发展,应该从刑事政策的修正等途径进行制度的革新与保障。 The procuratorial organ, which acts as the claimer for penalty in the criminal procedure, need to incarnate the restraint in its activities in accordance with the criterion of esteeming the person's subjective status, consulting the public order and good customs, tolerance and introspection. However, this does not mean the procuratorial authority would retreat in an unprincipled way, and neither means its regulation function on social life is decreasing. A legal supervision system with characteristics of people oriented and human interest while solemn and just should be established by reforming the system from the aspect of modifying the criminal policy so that the procuratorial power would realize its restraining modest improvement.
作者 李森红
出处 《国家检察官学院学报》 CSSCI 2009年第5期38-43,共6页 Journal of National Prosecutors College
关键词 谦抑性 道德 刑事政策 modesty and restraint morality criminal policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1弗雷德·英博 何家弘.《审讯与供述》[M].群众出版社,1992年版..
  • 2波斯纳 苏力译.《法理学问题》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1994年版.第93页.
  • 3庞兴华:《侦讯谋略》,警官教育出版社,1994年,第8页.
  • 4林东茂.《卧底警探的法律问题》[J].(台北)刑事法杂志,.
  • 5阿瑟·S·奥布里等.《刑事审讯》,但彦铮等译,西南师范大学出版社,1998年版,第171页。
  • 6Stephen A.Saltzburg & Daniel J.Capra:American Rriminal Procedure,Sixth Edition,2000,p.990.

共引文献137

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部