摘要
目的:观察比较常规针刺与深刺太阳穴(EX-HN5)治疗血管神经性头痛的疗效差异,寻找更为有效的针刺方法,提高针刺治疗效果。方法:将164例血管神经性头痛患者随机分为常规针刺组和深刺治疗组,两组取穴、疗程相同,观察治疗效果。结果:常规针刺组治愈率为48.8%,深刺治疗组为56%;常规针刺组有效率87.8%,深刺治疗组为95%。两组的疗效比较差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。结论:掌握特殊的深刺太阳穴方法可提高疗效,减少针刺次数,缩短疗程。
Objective:To observe therapeutic effect deference of common needling and deep needling on ungioneurotic headache, search the effective therapeutic method and improve the effect of treatment. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four cases of angioneurotic headache were divided into 2 groups:common needling group and deep needling group,the point and the period were same, observe the effect of them. Results : The cure rate of the common needling group was 48.8% ,the cure rate of the deep needling group was 56% ;the effective rate of the common needling group was 87. 8% ,the effective rate of the deep needling group was 95%. There were very significant differences in the therapeutic effect of the two groups ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion: Accurate method of deep needling the point EX-HN 5 (TaiYang) can improve the effect of treatment,reduce the times of needling,and shorten the period.
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2009年第10期1780-1781,共2页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
常规针刺
深刺
太阳穴
对照观察
common needling
deep needling
EX-HN5 (TaiYang)
contrast observation