期刊文献+

约束随机场下的边坡可靠度随机有限元分析方法 被引量:35

Slope reliability analysis by random FEM under constraint random field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前边坡可靠度中常用的简化分析方法,不考虑边坡土体的空间变异性,每次计算整个边坡都取用相同的强度参数,由离散点试样试验得到的土体参数统计特性只能反映点特性,而边坡的稳定性受滑面上平均抗剪强度特性控制,因此,需要考虑空间范围内的平均特性。描述空间变异性的随机场理论对变异性较高的土体,实际上高估了其空间变异性。把随机场理论和地质统计中的区域化变量理论结合起来,建立约束随机场,并在此基础上进行Monte-Carlo随机有限元分析。计算实例表明,在高变异性条件下约束随机场能有效降低完全随机场的模拟方差,得到更低的破坏概率。对比了随机有限元和简化法的计算结果表明,简化法在土体强度变异性很高时其结果并非偏于保守。另外也指出了可靠度分析中存在的边坡尺度效应和简化法的适用条件。 The simplified method for slope reliability analysis ignores the spatial variability and use same strength parameters during every computation. The probabilistic characterization of soil properties are obtained through discrete sample test; thus can only represent point variability. The stability of slopes is often controlled by the average shear strength within a zone of influence, hence the average properties in the slope domain should be accounted. The unconfined random field ignores the samples' location information and may lead to higher variability especially when the variability of soil is high. The constraint random field (CRF) is proposed and implemented utilizing random field theory and regionalized variable theory of geostatistics to ensure that the random field realizations match the parameters at the sample locations exactly; and slope reliability analysis is performed by Monte-Carlo random FEM (RFEM) and shear strength reduction technique. The computation results show that the CRF can significantly reduce variance of the random field simulation and get lower probability of failure when the soil variability is high. The comparison of RFEM and simplified method also shows that the simplified method will not always overestimate the probability of failure. The scale effect in slope reliability analysis is highlighted through RFEM; and the applicability of simplified method is discussed.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期3086-3092,共7页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.40802077) 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(No.kzcx-yw-151)
关键词 边坡稳定性 可靠度分析 约束随机场 有限元 边坡尺度效应 slope stability reliability analysis constraint random field finite elements slope scale effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1WU T H, KRAFT L M. Safety analysis of slopes[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation, Eng. Div., ASCE, 1970, 96: 609-630.
  • 2ALONSO E E. Risk analysis of slopes and its application to slopes in Canadian sensitive clays[J]. Geoteehnique, 1976, 26:453-472.
  • 3ANG A H S, TANG W H. Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Vol.Ⅰ. Basic principles[M]. New York: John Wiley, 1975.
  • 4LI K S, LUMB P. Probabilistic design of slopes[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1987, 24(4): 520- 535.
  • 5LOW B K, GILBERT R B, WRIGHT S G. Slope reliability analysis using generalized method of slices[J]. Journal of Geoteehnieal and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(4): 350-362.
  • 6HASSAN A M, WOLFF T F. Search algorithm for minimum reliability index of earth slopes[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(4): 301-308.
  • 7GRIFFITHS D V, FENTON G A. Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements[J]. Journal of Geotechuical and Geoenvironmeutal Engineering, 2004, 130(5): 507-518.
  • 8JOHN T. C. Geotechnical engineering reliability: How well do we know what we are doing?[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 985- 1003.
  • 9VANMARCKE E H. Random fields: analysis and synthesis[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1983.
  • 10FENTON G A. Data Analysis/Geostatistics. Probabilistic Methods in Geotechnical Engineering[C]//ASCE Uncertainty Conference. Madison: [s. n.], 1996.

二级参考文献12

共引文献785

同被引文献316

引证文献35

二级引证文献331

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部