期刊文献+

不同阳极靶与滤过器组合的乳腺DR成像性能比较 被引量:2

Comparision of imaging quality of different anode/filter combination for digital mammography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对数字乳腺X线摄影不同阳极靶与滤过器组合的成像性能进行对比。方法采用不同厚度乳腺成像体模,选择不同的阳极靶与滤过器组合在自动曝光模式下成像。测量图像信噪比和腺体吸收剂量,并引入图像品质因数综合评价成像性能。结果对于不同厚度的乳腺体模,使用钨铑阳极滤过器组合平均腺体吸收剂量比其他组合可以降低26.32%~42.11%,图像品质因数高于其他组合5.06%~37.43%。随着腺体厚度的增加平均腺体吸收剂量逐步增加,而图像信噪比和图像品质因数则随厚度的增加而下降。结论当体模厚度在4.0~9.0cm时,采用钨铑阳极滤过器组合可以在保证图像质量的同时减少腺体吸收剂量,总体成像性能要优于其他两种组合。 Objective To compare the imaging quality of different anode/filter combination for digital mammography system.Methods Mammography accreditation phantom with phantom thickness from 4.0 cm to 9.0 cm was used to simulate human breast tissue,and three different combinations of anode/filter material were employed under the automatic exposure mode.The image signal to noise ratio(SNR) and mean glandular dose(MGD) were measured.The figure of merit(FOM) was used to evaluate the imaging performance of digital mammography.Results For 4.0-9.0 cm phantom thicknesses,the MGD of tungsten anode and rhodium filter combination(W/Rh) was lower by 26.32%-42.11% than other two combinations;the FOM of W/Rh achieved higher by 5.06%-37.43% than the others.SNR and FOM decreased with the increase of phantom thickness,and the MGD became higher with thicker phantom.Conclusion For 4.0-9.0 cm phantom thicknesses,W/Rh anode/filter has the best imaging quality with good image performance and low radiation dose.
作者 白玫 郑钧正
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期1707-1709,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 数字乳腺X线摄影 阳极与滤过器组合 信噪比 平均腺体吸收剂量 品质因数 Digital mammography Anode/filter combination Signal to noise ratio Mean glandular dose Figure of merit
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Dance DR,Thilander Klang A,Sandborg M,et al.Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast,signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography:a Monte Carlo study.Br J Radiol,2000,73(874):1056-1067.
  • 2Doyle P,Martin CJ,Gentle D.Application of contrast-to-noise ratio in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography:comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulations.Phys Med Biol,2006,51(11):2953-2970.
  • 3Dance DR,Skinner CL,Young KC,et al.Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.Phys Med Biol,2000,45(11):3225-3240.
  • 4Perry N,Broeders M,de Wolf C,et al.European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.4th ed.Luxembourg:European Communities,2006,chapter 2.
  • 5Young KC.Breast dose surveys in the NHSBSP:software and instruction manual,Version 2.0.NHSBSP Report 04/05.Guildford,2004.
  • 6Toroi P,Zanca F,Young KC,et al.Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.Eur Radiol,2007,17(9):2368-2375.
  • 7Van Ongeval C,Bosmans H,Van Steen A,et al.Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography:results of a prospective clinical trial.Eur Radiol,2006,16(6):1360-1366.
  • 8Saunders RS Jr,Samei E,Jesneck JL,et al.Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector.Med Phys,2005,32(2):588-599.

同被引文献16

  • 1李朝明,郭永萍,李登维.乳腺钼靶X线摄影与数字化摄影[J].医用放射技术杂志,2005(7):25-26. 被引量:2
  • 2秦维昌.主译.乳腺摄影质量控制手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.19—22.
  • 3Aminah M, Ng KH, Abdullah BJ, et al. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast- to- noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2010, 33 : 329 -334.
  • 4Destouet JM, Bassett LW, Yaffe MJ, et al. The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA. Am Coil Radiol,2005,2: 585-594.
  • 5Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Med Phys, 2010, 37:962-969.
  • 6Borg M, Badr I, Royle GJ. The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimization in digital mammography: a literature view. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2012, 151:81-88.
  • 7Thomson FJ. Automatic technique parameter selection on a digital mammography system: an evaluation of SNR and CNR as a function of AGD on a GE senographe DS. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2006,29:251-256.
  • 8Williams MB, Raghunathan P, More MJ, et al. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med Phys, 2008, 35:2414-2423.
  • 9Cunha DM, Tomal A, Poletti ME. Optimization of X-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol, 2012, 57:1919-1935.
  • 10Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, et al, Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Br J Radiol, 2006, 79: 981-990.

引证文献2

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部