期刊文献+

空间通信网QoS性能测量与可视化 被引量:2

Space network measurement and visualization technique of measurement results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将QoS性能测量与层次化动态雷达图可视化方法相结合,提出了一种空间通信网QoS性能仿真新方法,构建了仿真系统平台.同时,在分析空间通信网QoS性能参数的基础上,提出了一种改进的双分组对路径带宽测量方法,并利用空间通信网仿真系统验证了该方法的可行性和有效性. The network measurement is of great importance to the QoS of space communication network. A new space path capacity measurement method and a novel visualization technique of measurement results called "dynamic radar graphic" are proposed in this paper. The accuracy and efficiency of the methods are proved in the simulated space network platform.
出处 《中国科学院研究生院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期670-680,共11页 Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
基金 国家"863"计划项目(2007AA0Z297) 国家自然科学基金项目(60773137) 中国科学院研究生院院长基金(O85101HM03)共同资助
关键词 空间通信网 QoS性能测量 层次化动态雷达图 路径带宽 space communication network, QoS parameter measurement, hierarchical dynamic radar graphic, path capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1谈杰,李星.网络测量综述[J].计算机应用研究,2006,23(2):5-8. 被引量:44
  • 2李彪,张灿,付前程.空间通信系统模拟与QoS性能的测量[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2008,25(4):530-537. 被引量:2
  • 3Prasad R, Dovrolis C, Murray M, et al. Bandwidth estimation: metrics, measurement techniques, and tools[J]. IEEE Network Magazine, 2003, 17(6) :27-35.
  • 4余肖生,周宁,张芳芳.高维数据可视化方法研究[J].情报科学,2007,25(1):117-120. 被引量:12
  • 5任永功,于戈.数据可视化技术的研究与进展[J].计算机科学,2004,31(12):92-96. 被引量:54
  • 6Alines G, Kalidindi S. One-way delay metric for IPPM : USA, RFC 2679 [ EB/OL]. 1999-09 [ 2009-03-23 ]. http ://www. ieff. org/rfe/rfc2679. txt.
  • 7Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R, et al. RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications: USA, RFC 3550[EB/OL]. 2003[2009-03- 23 ]. http ://www. ieff. org/rfc/rfc3550. txt.
  • 8韦安明,王洪波,林宇,程时端.IP网带宽测量技术研究与进展[J].电子学报,2006,34(7):1301-1310. 被引量:11
  • 9Alines G, Kalidindi S, Zekauskas M A. One-way packet loss metric for IPPM: USA, RFC 2680[EB/OL]. 1999-09[2009-03-23]. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc2680. txt.
  • 10Jacobson V. Pathchar: a tool to infer characteristics of intemet paths: USA[ EB/OL/CP]. 1999-05-28 [2009-03-231. Ftp://ftp. ee.1b1. gov/ pathchar.

二级参考文献155

  • 1匡罗贝,肖晓强,李皓平,薛鹏.一种自相似网络平均排队延迟分析模型[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(z2):59-61. 被引量:8
  • 2胡永刚.数据挖掘中可视化技术综述[J].计算机与现代化,2004(10):32-33. 被引量:14
  • 3欧海英,张为华,李晓斌,刘春梅.平行坐标可视化技术在固体火箭发动机优化设计中的应用[J].固体火箭技术,2004,27(4):255-259. 被引量:7
  • 4William B Norton.Internet service providers and peering[A].Proceedings of NANOG 19[C].http://www.equinix.com/pdf/whitepapers/PeeringWP.2.pdf,2000
  • 5C Dovrolis,P Ramanathan,D Moore.What do packet dispersion techniques measure?[A].INFOCOM[C].NY:IEEE,2001.905-914.
  • 6C Dovrolis,P Ramanathan,D Moore.Packet dispersion techniques and a capacity emulation methodology[J].IEEE/ACM trans.on Networking,2004,12 (6):963 -977.
  • 7Wenyu Jiang.Detecting and measuring asymmetric links in an IP network[R].Columbia University,http://www.cs.columbia.edu/,1999.
  • 8Steven M Bellovin.A Best-Case network performance model[EB/OL].http://www.research.att.com/smb/papers/netmeas.ps,1992
  • 9V Paxson.End-to-End internet packet dynamics[J].IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking,1999,7(3):277-292.
  • 10J C Bolot.End-to-End packet delay and loss behavior in the internet[A].ACM SIGCOMM[C].NY:ACM Press,1993.289-298.

共引文献117

同被引文献18

  • 1Floyd S, Handley M, Padhye J. A comparison of equation-based and AIMD congestion control[ EB/OL]. [ 2010-04-03 ]. ACIRI, 2000. http: //www. aciri. org/tfrc/aimd. pdf.
  • 2Mahdavi J, Floyd S. TCP-friendly unicast rate-based flow control[ EB/OL]. [ 2010-04-02 ]. Note sent to end2end-interest mailing list, 1997. http://www. psc. edu/networking/papers/tcp-friendly. html.
  • 3Handley M, Padhye J, Floyd S, et al. TCP friendly rate control (TFRC) : protocol specification[ EB/OL]. [2010-04-02]. Internet Draft. 2002. http://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3448. txt.
  • 4Miyabayashi M, Wakamiya N, Murata M, et al. MPEG-TFRCP: video transfer with TCP-friendly rate control protocol[ C ]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC' 01 ). 2001 (1) : 137- 141.
  • 5Akyildiz I F, Akan O B, Chen C, et al. Interplanetary internet: state of the art and research challenges[ J]. IEEE Communication Magazine, 2004, 42 (7) : 108-118.
  • 6Almes G, Kalidindi S. One-way delay metric for IPPM : USA. [ EB/OL] RFC 2679. 1999 [ 2010- 04-02 ]. http://www, left. org/rfc/ rfc2679. txt.
  • 7Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R, et al. RTP: A transport protocol for real-time applications[ EB/OL]. IETF RFC 3550, 2003 [ 2010- 04-02 ]. http ://www. ietf. org/rfc/rfc3550.txt.
  • 8Alines G, Kalidindi S. One-way packet loss metric for IPPM: USA[ EB/OL]. RFC 2680, 1999[2010- 04-02]. http://www. ieff. org/ rfc/rfc2680. txt.
  • 9ITU-T Rec, Y1541. Network performance objectives for IP2 based services, telecommunication standardization sector of ITU [ S/OL]. 2006[2010- 04-02]. http://www. itu. int/itudoe/itu-t/aap/sg13aap/history/y1541/y1541. html.
  • 10Zheng W, Meng X, Jiang L Z. Research on QoS for space-ground networks [ C ] //2008 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation. 2008: 1002-1006.

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部