期刊文献+

冠状动脉药物洗脱支架的特点及其临床安全性 被引量:4

Characteristics and clinical security of coronary artery drug-eluting stent
下载PDF
导出
摘要 尽管随着冠状动脉支架设计工艺与技术的改善,金属裸支架的再狭窄发生率已降至15%左右,但仍成为制约冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病介入治疗远期疗效的最大瓶颈。药物洗脱支架是近年来问世的新颖支架,在预防术后再狭窄的发生方面展示了美好的前景。虽然药物洗脱支架的临床结果令人鼓舞,但是适应证还是相对单一,一些相关问题还未解决。那么药物洗脱支架究竟面临着怎样的问题?应该怎样认识这些问题?文章的中心思想是比较冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病患者采用药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架治疗的安全性,分析影响药物洗脱支架安全性的主要因素以及其面临的问题,探讨药物洗脱支架的未来发展方向。 Technology and technique of coronary artery stent have been developed to a certain degree, restenosis rate of metal stent reduces to 15%, but coronary artery stent is still difficult for long-term effect of interventional therapy on coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Drug-eluting stent is newly discovered during recent years, while it is prospect for preventing restenosis postoperatively. Although clinical efficacy of drug-eluting stent is encouraged, indication is still simple. In addition, some events related to drug-eluting stent remain poorly unknown. This study was designed to compare security between drug-eluting stent and metal bared stent, analyze major factors correlated with security of drug-eluting stent, and investigate the development of drug-eluting stent.
作者 赵惠 肖虹
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第38期7575-7578,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

  • 1刘振江,周胜华,贺达仁.冠心病介入治疗过度应用的分析和对策[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(3):10-12. 被引量:9
  • 2籍振国,刘坤申.从循证医学看目前冠心病的药物治疗[J].医学与哲学,2005,26(10X):35-37. 被引量:3
  • 3Serruys P,Foley D,Suttorp MJ,et al.A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesions:final results of the Additional Value of NIR Stents for Treatment of Long Coronary Lesions(ADVANCE) study.J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,39:393-399.
  • 4Mandeep S,Bernard J,Gersh,et al.Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.Circulation,2004,109:2727-2731.
  • 5Stone GW,Ellis SG,Cannon L,et al.Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease:a randomized controlled trial.JAMA,2005,294:1215-1223.
  • 6Hoffman SN,TenBrook JA,Wolf MP,et al.A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty:one-to eight -year outcomes.J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41:1293-1304.
  • 7Serruys PW,Ong ATL,van Herweden LA,et al.Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease:the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study(ARTS) randomized trial.J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46:575-581.
  • 8Rodriguez AE,Baldi J,Fernandez Pereira C,et al.Five-year follow-up of the Argentina randomized study coronary angioplasty with stenting versus coronary bypass surgery in patients with multiple vessel disease (ERACI Ⅱ).J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46:582-588.
  • 9Morice MC,Serruys PW,Sousa JE,et al.A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization.N Engl J Med,2002,346:1773-1780.
  • 10Leon MB,Moses JW,Popma J J,et al.A multicenter randomized clinical study of the Sirolimus-eluting stent in native coronary lesions:angiographic results.Circulation,2002,106(suppl):393.

共引文献47

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部