期刊文献+

A COMPARISON OF A SIMPLE PROCUREMENT AUCTION AND GENERALIZED NASH BARGAINING 被引量:2

A COMPARISON OF A SIMPLE PROCUREMENT AUCTION AND GENERALIZED NASH BARGAINING
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper presents a comparison mechanism for a simple procurement auction and generalized Nash bargaining solution in a procurement circumstance. The buyer who hopes to fulfill a project has two options. First, she may award the project to the old provider with an efficient quality by bargaining Second, she may give the project to the firm who submits the lowest bid through a simple procurement second-price sealed-bid auction with a pre-fixed quality. We compare the expected revenue in the auction with the deterministic profit of the bargaining. In different parameters cases, we find the borderline functions between the two options with respect to the buyer's bargaining power and the amount of bidders. We also compare our simple procurement auction (SPA) with the optimal multidimensional bid auction by Che (1993), and find our model protects the buyer's private valuation information by forfeiting some profits. Some properties of the difference between the two auctions are proposed, especially there is no revenue difference when the amount of bidders approaches infinity. This paper presents a comparison mechanism for a simple procurement auction and generalized Nash bargaining solution in a procurement circumstance. The buyer who hopes to fulfill a project has two options. First, she may award the project to the old provider with an efficient quality by bargaining Second, she may give the project to the firm who submits the lowest bid through a simple procurement second-price sealed-bid auction with a pre-fixed quality. We compare the expected revenue in the auction with the deterministic profit of the bargaining. In different parameters cases, we find the borderline functions between the two options with respect to the buyer's bargaining power and the amount of bidders. We also compare our simple procurement auction (SPA) with the optimal multidimensional bid auction by Che (1993), and find our model protects the buyer's private valuation information by forfeiting some profits. Some properties of the difference between the two auctions are proposed, especially there is no revenue difference when the amount of bidders approaches infinity.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2009年第3期341-357,共17页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 70701040
关键词 COMPARISON simple procurement auction generalized Nash bargaining multidimensional auction. Comparison, simple procurement auction, generalized Nash bargaining, multidimensional auction.
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Admati, A.R. & Perry, M. (1987). Strategic delay in bargaining. Review of Economic Studies, 54:345-364.
  • 2Branco, F. (1997). The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 28 (1): 63-81.
  • 3Bulow, J. & Klemperer, P. (1996). Auctions versus negotiations. The American Economic Review, 86:180-194.
  • 4Che, Y.K. (1993). Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 24:668-680.
  • 5Chen, F. (2007). Auctioning supply contracts. Management Science, 53:1562-1576.
  • 6Chu, L.Y. & Sappington, D. (2007). A note on optimal procurement contracts with limited direct cost inflation. Journal of Economic Theory, 137:745-753.
  • 7Cramton, P. (1992). Strategic delay in bargaining with two-sided uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 59:205-225.
  • 8Harstad, R.M. & Rothkopf, M.H. (1995). Withdrawable bids as winner's curse insurance. Operations Research, 43 (6): 983-994.
  • 9Kessler, A.S. & Lulfesmann, C. (2004). Bilateral bargaining, unverifiable quality and options to return. Economic Theory, 23: 395-410.
  • 10Krishna, V. (2002). Auction Theory. Academic Press: 15-16.

同被引文献26

  • 1赵黎明,陈炳福.国防R&D发展特点与运行机制:国际经验与启示[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(4):32-34. 被引量:8
  • 2穆素.讨价还价理论及其应用[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005.
  • 3BAJARI P, MCMILLAN R, TADELIS S. Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement.. An Empirical Analysis[J].The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2009, 25(2):372-399.
  • 4GOLDBERG V P. Competitive Bidding and the Production of Precontract Information[J].The Bell Journal of Economics, 1977, 8(1): 250-261.
  • 5BULOW J, KLEMPERER P. Auctions Versus Negotiations[J].The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(1): 180- 194.
  • 6CHE Y K. Design Competition Through Multidimensional Auctions [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1993, 24(4): 668-680.
  • 7NASH J. The Bargaining Problems[J]. Econometrica, 1950,18(1) :155-162.
  • 8THOMAS C J, WILSON B J. A Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations[J].Rand Journal of Economics, 2002,33(1) :140-155.
  • 9KJERSTAD E. Auctions vs Negotiations: A Study of Price Differentials[J]. Health Economics, 2005, 14 (12):1 239-1 251.
  • 10黄国杰,刘云.美国国防基础研究的政府资助与管理机制研究[J].国防技术基础,2007(8):32-38. 被引量:9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部