期刊文献+

偏离权配额交易——改革WTO体制下补偿制度的一种新思路 被引量:1

The System of Non-compliance Quota Trade under the WTO
原文传递
导出
摘要 现行WTO争端解决机制下的补偿主要是敦促被诉方执行其建议和裁决的一种工具,难以承载国内法和一般国际法上补偿制度的强制性赔偿功能。关于补偿制度改革,已有建议主要包括改为金钱补偿和不予改革两种,但两者均因受制于法律理想与政治现实之间的矛盾而难以推进。新的改革思路——"偏离权配额交易"——基本满足三个条件:政治上的可接受性、顾及WTO成员从多边自由贸易体制中获益的能力差异以及与WTO所追求目标的可兼容性。 The existing compensation under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is designed to be a device to prompt compliance with its recommendations or rulings of the DSB by the defendant, rather than serving the purpose of compulsory compensation for losses under the compensation system in domestic laws and in international law as well. Currently, there are mainly two different proposals on the reform of the compensation system: pecuniary compensation and no -reform approach -both are difficult to implement due to the conflict between legal ideals and political reality. mechanism quirements bers in the A new approach to improving the compensation under the WTO dispute settlement is the "system of non - compliance quota trade". This system basically meets three requirements: being politically acceptable, taking into account the discrepancy among WTO Members in the capacity of availing the multilateral free trade system, and being reconcilable with the aim of the WTO.
作者 韩永红
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期142-149,共8页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献32

  • 1.[EB/OL].http.//www.wto.org,.
  • 21929 PCJJ Series A,No.8,4,at 12,in Petros C.Mavroidis,Remedies in the WTO Legal System:Between a Rock and a Hard Place,European Journal of International Law,11(2000).
  • 3Petros C.Mavroidis,Remedies in the WTO Legal System:Between a Rock and a Hard Place,European Journal of International Law,11(2000).
  • 4Patricio Gran,Remedies Under WTO Law,Journal of International Economic Law,2001 4(755).
  • 5WTO Panel Report,US-Import Measures on certain Products from the EC,WT/DS165/R,circulated 17 July 2000.
  • 6WTO Panel Report,Guatemala-Anti-Dumping Investgation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico,WT/DS60/R,19 June 1998,para.8.2.
  • 7WTO Article 21.5 Panel Report,EC-Regime for the Importation,Sale and Distribution of Bananas-Recourse by Ecuador,WT/DS27/RW/ECU,adopted 6 May 1999,para 6.105.
  • 8Article 21.5 Panel Report,Australia-Subsidies Provided to Producers and Exporters of Automotive Leather ("Automotive Leather"),WT/DS 126/RW,adopted 11 February 2000,para.6.27.
  • 9Article 16.1 of Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization:"Except as otherwise provided under this Agreement or the Multilateral Trade Agreements,the WTO shall be guided by the decisions,procedures and customary practices followed by the CONTRACTING PARTIES to GATT1947 and the bodies established in the framework of GATT1947."
  • 10Article 21.5 Panel Report,Automotive Leather,para.6.32.

共引文献5

同被引文献29

  • 1蒋新苗.DSU补偿措施的革新路径[J].中国法学,2004(4):168-178. 被引量:6
  • 2张军旗.论WTO国际责任的范围及其发展方向[J].政治与法律,2006(6):87-93. 被引量:6
  • 3[美]戴维·帕尔米特,[希腊]佩特罗斯·C·马弗鲁第斯.《WTO中的争端解决:实践与程序》,罗培新等译,北京大学出版社2005年版,第150页.
  • 4Ernst-Ulrich Petersman, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Kluwer Law International Ltd, 1997,p. 80.
  • 5GATT Doe, Report of the Ad Hoe Group on I.egal Amendments to the General Agreement, COM. TD/F/ 4, 4 March 1966.
  • 6WTO Doc, WT/GC/W/162, 1 April 1999.
  • 7Marco Bronckers and Naboth van den Broek, Financial Compensation in the WTO.. Improving the Rem- edies of WTO Dispute Settlement, 8 Journal of International Economic Law 101, March 2005, pp. 103,113, 124.
  • 8Joost Pauwelyn, Enforcement and Countermeasure in the WTO= Rules are Rules-toward a more collective approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 335, April 2000, pp. 345--346.
  • 9WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/91, 16 July 2007.
  • 10WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/17, 9 October 2002;WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/40, 27 January 2003.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部