期刊文献+

组织创新气氛与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究 被引量:180

A Study on the Relationship between the Effects of the Organizational Innovative Climate and those of Motivational Preference,on Employees' Innovative Behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于创新气氛的定义,两种主要方法被广泛采用,认知图式法和共享认知法。工作动机的类别有两类,即情境型动机和特质型动机。情境型动机包括内在动机与外在动机两种导向。特质型动机涉及个体对激励因素的偏好问题,包括内在激励偏好和外在激励偏好两种导向。研究表明,内在激励偏好正向预测创新行为,外在激励偏好也正向预测创新行为。外在激励偏好正向调节创新气氛与创新行为的关系,但内在激励偏好反向调节创新气氛与创新行为的关系。也就是说,内在激励偏好越高,创新气氛对创新行为的影响越弱;内在激励偏好越低,创新气氛对创新行为的影响越强。外在激励偏好越高,创新气氛对创新行为的影响越强;外在激励偏好越低,创新气氛对创新行为的影响越弱。 In terms of the definition of the innovative climate,two approaches have been generally adopted:the cognitive schemata approach and the shared perception approach.There are two kinds of work motivation:the situational motivation and the trait motivation.The former includes two kinds of orientations—the intrinsic motivation and the extrinsic motivation orientation.The trait motivation involves the individual preference for motivational factors,including the intrinsic motivational preference(IMP)and the extrinsic motivational preference(EMP).The results of our study show that both the IMP and the EMP positively moderate the innovative behavior,that the EMP positively adjusts the relationship between the innovative climate and the innovative behavioral and that the IMP,however,negatively adjusts the said relationship.In other words,the stronger the IMP is,the weaker the impact of the innovative climate on the innovative behavior;the weaker the IMP,the greater the effect of the innovative climate on innovative behavior.The stronger the EMP,the greater the effect mentioned above.
作者 刘云 石金涛
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第10期88-101,114,共15页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(中国企业组织创新气氛研究--以提升企业自主创新能力为导向 编号70672072)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Ekavll, G., 1996, "Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, pp.105-123.
  • 2Neil R. Anderson & Michael A. West, 1998, "Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, pp.235-258.
  • 3Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H.,Lazenby, J. & Herron, M., 1996, "Assessing the Work Enviornment for Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, vol.39(5), pp.1154-1184.
  • 4Isaksen, S. G., Lauer K. J. & Ekvall, G., 1999, "Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A Measure of the Climate for Creativity and Change", Psychological Reports, 85, pp.665-674.
  • 5Amabile, T. M., 1997, "Motivating Creativity in Organizations", California Management Review, vol. 40(1), pp.22-26.
  • 6Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A., 1994, "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Work Place", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.580-607.
  • 7Onne Janssen, 2000, "Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative work Behavior", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp.287-302.
  • 8Amabile, T. M., 1993, "Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace", Human Resource Management Review, 3, pp. 185-201.
  • 9Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R., 1976, "Motivation Through the Design of Work", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp.250-279.
  • 10Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M., 1985, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum.

二级参考文献24

  • 1[1]Bollen K A. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989
  • 2[4]Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991
  • 3[5]Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression / correlational analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975
  • 4[6]Bagozzi R P, Baumgartner H, Yi Y. State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 18: 505~518
  • 5[7]Anderson T W, Rubin H. Statistical inference in factor analysis. In Proceedings of the third Berkeley symposium (Vol. V). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956. 111~150
  • 6[8]Joreskog K G. Interaction and nonlinear modeling: issue and approaches. In: Schumacker R E, Marcoulides G A ed. Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998. 239~250
  • 7[9]Joreskog K G. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 1971, 36: 409~426
  • 8[10]Bagozzi R P, Yi Y. On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 1989, 26(3): 271~284
  • 9[11]MacKenzie S B, Spreng R A. How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 18(1): 519~529
  • 10[12]Hanushek E A, Jackson J E. Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977

同被引文献2234

引证文献180

二级引证文献1475

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部