期刊文献+

煤炭企业进入模式动态选择的合作博弈分析 被引量:2

Cooperative game analysis on dynamic entry mode choice of coal enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以调查问卷为依据,用构建的合作博弈模型分析了煤炭企业跨区域进入模式动态选择问题。结论表明,合资企业协调成本、跨区域投资煤炭企业相对于西部合作者的资源优势程度的动态变化、跨区域投资所投入的人员和设备等资产专用性,均影响了煤炭企业进入模式的动态选择;当东中部煤炭企业比西部地区合作方有资源优势时,协调成本主导了合资企业的股权变动。研究认为,跨区域投资煤炭企业加强培育其核心资源、重视文化差异,对于增强进入模式谈判力尤为关键。 Based on questionnaire, this article adopts cooperative game model to analyze dynamic choice of coal enterprises' inter--regional entry modes. Results indicate that coordinate costs, dynamic comparison of resources superiority between coal enterprises and west cooperators, devoted human and equipment asset specificity of coal enterprises influence dynamic entry mode choices. When ease and middle coal enterprises provide stronger asset exclusiveness than that of west region, coordinate costs dominant stock equity alteration of joint venture. It suggests that coal enterprises' enhancing their core resources and attaching importance to cultural differences is crucial for strengthening entry mode bargaining power.
出处 《中国矿业》 北大核心 2009年第8期46-49,共4页 China Mining Magazine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70873058) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目(09SJD790045)
关键词 煤炭企业 跨区域投资 进入模式 动态选择 合作博弈 coal enterprises inter-regional investmeng entry modes dynamic choice cooperative game
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1PADMANABHAN P,CHO K R.Ownership Strategy for A Foreign Affiliate:An Empirical Investigation of Japanese Firms[J].Management International Review,1996,36(1):45-65.
  • 2YADONG L,NEALE O Connor..Structural Change to Direct Investment in China:An Evolutionary Perspective[J].Journal of Applied Management Studies,1998,7(1):95-110.
  • 3聂名华,颜晓辉.外商在华投资的独资化倾向[J].统计研究,2006,23(4):79-80. 被引量:3
  • 4BUCKLEY P,CASSON M.Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies:Extending the Internalization Approach[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1998(29):539-562.
  • 5王苍峰.跨国公司谋求在华合资企业控股权动因分析及启示[J].现代经济探讨,2004(1):58-60. 被引量:2
  • 6BROUTHERS K D,BROUTHERS L.E.Why Service and Manufacturing Entry Mode Choices Differ:The Influence of Transaction Cost Factors,Risk and Trust[J].Journal of Management Studies,2003,40(5):1179-1204.
  • 7HENNART J F,Reddy S.The Choice between Merger/acquisition and Joint Ventures:The Case of Japanese Investors in the United States[J].Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(1):1-12.
  • 8MUDAMBI R,MUDAMBI S M.Diversification and Market Entry Choices in the Context of Direct Investment[J].International Business Review,2002(11):35-55.
  • 9CHANG S J,ROSENZWEIG P M.The Choice of Entry Mode in Sequential Foreign Direct Investment[J].Strategic Management Journal,2001(22):747-776.
  • 10李维安,李宝权.跨国公司在华独资倾向成因分析:基于股权结构战略的视角[J].管理世界,2003,19(1):57-62. 被引量:117

二级参考文献48

  • 1谢立伯.中外合资企业不稳定性剖析[J].现代管理科学,2001(2):17-18. 被引量:5
  • 2王晓蔚,吕荣华.企业合资中外资控股、购并问题探析[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,8(1):76-81. 被引量:1
  • 3[5]夏晓辉.合资企业的繁荣与终结--一个所有权安排的模型[D].复旦大学经济系硕士论文,1997.
  • 4[6]周依亭.合资"姻缘"终结联合利华中国独行[N].经济观察报,2002-07-22(B3).
  • 5[7]Chao,C- C,Yu,E,S.H.Are wholly foreign- owned enterprises better than joint venture? [J].Joumal of International Econom ics, 1996, (40) :225 - 237.
  • 6[8]Chan, R. ,Hoy,M.East- West joint ventures and buyback contracts[J] .Journal of International Economics, 1991, (30):331-343.
  • 7Dunning J H. International production and the multinational enterprise[M], George Allen find Unwin, 1981.
  • 8Dunning J H. Multinational enterprises and the global economy[M]. Unwin Hyman Published, 1992.
  • 9Jan Svejnar. Bargainingpower, fear of disagreement, and wage settlements: Theory and evidence from U S industry[J]. Economatrica, 1986, 54 : 1055-1078.
  • 10Johnson H G. The efficiency and welfare implications of the intemational[A]. The international corporation[C]. MIT Press, 1970.

共引文献131

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部