期刊文献+

宫颈病变液基细胞学与组织病理学检查的分析研究 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对宫颈ThinPrep液基薄层细胞学(TCT)检查结果与组织病理学检查诊断的分析,评价TCT在宫颈病变诊断中的临床应用价值。方法对3 658例TCT检查标本用TBS分级系统进行分析,其中细胞学筛查为异常结果共417例,对其行阴道镜检查及病理检查。结果417例患者中,宫颈癌11例,上皮内高度病变52例,上皮内低度病变112例,不除外高度鳞状上皮内病变的不典型鳞状细胞病变39例,未明确意义的不典型鳞状上皮细胞病变203例。癌、高度病变、低度病变与病理活检的符合率分别为100%,96.15%,83.04%。结论TCT检查能明显提高涂片满意率和宫颈疾病诊断的敏感性及准确性,有利于宫颈病变筛查和早期诊断。
机构地区 北京民航总医院
出处 《现代中西医结合杂志》 CAS 2009年第31期3834-3835,共2页 Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1郎景和.子宫内膜癌诊治的几个问题[J].中华妇产科杂志,2000,35(5):261-263. 被引量:116
  • 2Savage EW, Chapman G. Cervical dysplasia and cancer[ M ]//Hacker NF, Moore JG. Essentials of obstetrics and gynecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998 : 654.
  • 3苏涛,章桂红,程利南.液基薄层细胞学技术在宫颈病变筛查中的应用及评价[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2004,31(4):252-255. 被引量:112
  • 4Tuncer ZS, Basaran M. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Onco,2005,26(6) :646.
  • 5Doyle B,Farrellc O. Liquid-based cytology improves productivity in cervical eytology screening[ J ]. Cytopathology, 2006,17 (2) : 60.
  • 6Taylor S, Kuhn L. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial[J]. Int J Cancer, 2006,118(4) :957.
  • 7Nygard JF,Nygard M. Pap smear screening in women under 30 in the Norwegian Coordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program, with a comparison of immediate biopsy vs Pap smear triage of moderate dysplasia[J], Acta Cyto,2006,50(3) :295 - 302.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Sulik SM, Kroeger K, Schultz JK, et al. Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional papanicolaou test? a systematic review. J Fam Pract, 2001,50(12):1040-1046.
  • 2Ries L, Kosary C, Hanky B, et al. SEER cancer statistics review,1973~1995. Bethesda,MD:National Cancer Institute, 1998.
  • 3Hutchinson ML, Cassin CM, Ball HG. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, 1991,96(3):300-305.
  • 4Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, et al. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol, 1996,40(1):81-89.
  • 5Pajtler M, Audy-Jurkovic S. Pap smear adequacy-is the assessing criterion induding endocervical cells really valid? Coll Antropol, 2002,26(2):565-570.
  • 6Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, et al. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer,2003,99(6):331-335.
  • 7Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquidbased cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quant itative survey. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,90(1):137-144.
  • 8Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening. Cancer, 1999,87(2):48-55.
  • 9Maxwell GL, Carlson JW, Ochoa M, et al. Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries. Obstet Gynocol, 2002,100(4):740-748.
  • 10Papillo JL, Zarka MA, St John TL. Evaluation of the ThinPreppap-test in clinical practic:a seven-month,16 314case experience in Northern Vermont. Acta Cytol, 1998,42(1):203-208.

共引文献226

同被引文献38

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部