期刊文献+

失代偿期肝硬化肝脏储备功能及预后的评估

Evaluate the prognosis and liver functional reserve of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估肝硬化失代偿期患者的肝脏储备功能及短期(3个月)预后。方法应用MELD评分、CTP分级及肝硬化的CT分级分别对81例肝硬化失代偿期患者进行评分及分级,比较不同MELD评分组、CTP分级组及CT分级组患者3个月的病死率及不同评价系统之间的相关性。结果33例患者在3个月内死亡。随着MELD、△MELD评分、CTP分级及CT分级的增加,患者的病死率逐渐升高,死亡组与出院组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MELD评分结果与CT分级结果的比较具有一致性,存在着对应关系。肝硬化CT分级与肝功能CTP分级的严重程度存在着对应关系,组间比较存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论MELD模型与CTP分级和CT分级均能较好的评价失代偿期肝硬化患者的肝脏储备功能及短期预后。 Objective Application of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) System and helical CT to evaluate the prognosis and liver functional reserve of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Methods Eighty one patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis were graded with MELD, CTP and CT for- mula. The death rate was observed within three month. Results Thirty three patients died within three month. When MELD, CTP and CT formula were increasing, the mortality of patients was also increasing. The result of MELD grade was consistency with CT classification. The result of CT classification was relativity with CTP grade. Conclusion Both MELD and CTP scores can accurately predict the short term prognosis of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. CT grading of liver cirrhosis plays an important role in the assessment of the severity and prognosis of liver cirrhosis.
出处 《西部医学》 2009年第10期1681-1684,共4页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 终末期肝病模型(MELD) Child—Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)分级 肝硬化CT分级 Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) System CT grading of liver cirrhosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1病毒性肝炎防治方案(试行)[J].中华传染病杂志,1995,13(4):241-247. 被引量:1767
  • 2Okamoto E, Kyo A, Yamanaka N. Prediction of the safe limits of hepatectomy by combined volumetric and functional measurements in patients with impaired hepatic function[J].Surgery ,1984,95(5): 586-591.
  • 3Farges O,Malassagne B,Flejou JF,et al. Risk of major liver resection in patients with in patients with underlying chronic liver disease [J].Ann Surg,1999,229(2):210-215.
  • 4Suc B, Panis Y, Belghiti J,et al. "Natural history"of hepatectomy[J].Be J Surg,1992,79(1):39-42.
  • 5根据1995年5月北京第五次全国传染病寄生虫病学术会议讨论修订:病毒性肝炎防治方案(试行)[J].中华内科杂志,1995,34(11):788-791.
  • 6Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg, 1973, 60:646-649.
  • 7Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology, 2001, 33:464-470.
  • 8Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, et al. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transpl, 2001, 7 : 567-580.
  • 9Freetman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transpl, 2002, 8:851-858.
  • 10Kamath PS, Kim WR. Is the change in MELD score a better indicator of mortality than baseline MELD score? Liver Transpl, 2003, 9:19-21.

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部