期刊文献+

构建我国刑事证据保全制度的思考 被引量:5

The Reflection on the Construction of Preservation System of Criminal Evidence in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行刑事诉讼法虽设立了申请取证制度,但证据保全制度则付之阙如。证据保全制度的建构顺应了我国建立有限传闻证据规则的刑事诉讼发展趋势。由证据保全的性质和功能所决定,法院应当成为决定和实施证据保全程序的唯一主体。我国应当从申请主体、申请条件和方式、管辖法院、对申请的处理、证据保全的方法、被保全证据的使用以及法律救济等方面来构建我国的刑事证据保全制度。 Although the present Law of Criminal Procedure of our country has set up the system of the application for collecting evidence, the system of preserving evidence is lacking. The construction of the system of preserving evidence is complying with the trend of the development of the criminal procedure. Our country is establishing the limited hearsay evidence rule. Because of the nature and the function, which the preservation of evidence owns, the court is to become the only main body who decides the implementation of the procedure for preserving evidence. Our country should construct the system of preserving the criminal evidence from the application main body, the application condition and the way, the competence of the court, the method to deal with the application and preserve the evidence, and the way to use the preserved evidence, as well as the legal relief to the application procedure.
作者 韩旭
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第9期87-92,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 申请取证 刑事证据保全 制度构建 apply for evidence collection preservation of criminal evidence system construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1[日]田口守一 刘迪等译.《刑事诉讼法》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第139页、第25页.
  • 2Alfredo Garcio, The compulsory Process Clause and the "Sporting Theory of Justice", The Supreme Court Evens the Score, Duquesne Law Review, Volume 28, 1990, p.623, p.625, p.625, p.633, p.626.
  • 3United States v. Cooper 341(Cir. Ct., D. Pa., 1800).
  • 4United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. At 33. United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. At 33.
  • 5United States v. Reid, 53 U.S. (12 How. )361, 363-365(1851).
  • 6Ex parte Harding, 120 U.S. 782(1887).
  • 7United States v. Van Duzee, 140 U. S. 169, 173(1891).
  • 8Blackmar v. United States, 284 U.S. 421, 442(1932).
  • 9Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 378 n. 1(1966).
  • 10Washington v. Texas, 388, 388, 388, 388 U.S. 14(1967).

共引文献116

同被引文献17

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部