极穷权置定性条件探析——基于权利冲突的话语讨论

On Definition Condition of Right in Extremity——Discussion based on right conflict

震区哄抢事件引发了公众对灾民哄抢行为罪与非罪界定的讨论,紧急避险和权利冲突理论告诉我们极穷状态下的哄抢行为并非犯罪,因为此时对生命的尊重与保障处于最为优先的地位,而划清罪与非罪界限的关键节点则在于对极穷权条件的界定。灾民所获取的他人财物,仅为生存所必须,并不能为自己的生存而牺牲他人的生存。

The looting affairs in the earthquake areas aroused the discussions on whether the looting activities of disaster victims are offenses or not. The Urgent Danger Prevention and Right Conflict theories tell us under the extreme situation the rob behavior does not commit crime, because at this time the respect and guarantee of life is placed on the initiative position. To make a clear distinction between offense and non- offense, the key lies in the definition of condition of Right in Extremity. The victims loot others＂ wealth and properties to survive, but they cannot do it in the price of others＂ sacrifice and survival.