期刊文献+

基于HS-树的所有MIPS求解算法

Computing All MIPS Based on HS-Tree
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本体在语义web中扮演很重要的角色.本体的重用、合并或者进一步扩展都有可能导致本体不一致.目前很多解决本体不一致的方法都需要计算最小不一致保持子集(MIPS).本文利用HS-树方法给出了一种能够有效计算本体中所有MIPS的算法.实验表明该算法是有效的,尤其对于本体中包含不可满足的概念远远多于MIPS的情形更加有效. Ontologies play an important role in Semantic Web. The reuse, merging or further extension of ontologies may result in inconsistency in ontologies. Currently most existing approaches for resolving inconsistency need to calculate Minimal-Incoherence-Preserving Sub-Tbox (MIPS) of an incoherent ontology. In this paper, an algorithm based on HS-Tree method is proposed for computing all the MIPS in ontologies. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is effective, especially for such cases that ontologies contain much more unsatisfiable concepts than MIPS.
出处 《北京交通大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期73-76,94,共5页 JOURNAL OF BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY
基金 国家"973"重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2007CB3071002007CB307106) 教育部博士点基金项目资助(20050004008)
关键词 语义WEB 不一致 HS-树 MIPS 本体 semantic web incoherence hitting stet tree(HS-Tree) MIPS ontologies
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kalyanpur A, Parsia B, Horridge M, et al. Finding AH Justifications of Owl D1 Entailments[C] //Proc of ISWC/ ASWC, 2007: 267- 280.
  • 2Schlobach S, Huang Z, Cornet R, et al. Debugging Incoherent Terminologies[J]. J. Autom. Reasoning, 2007, 39 (3): 317- 349.
  • 3Wang H, Horridge M, Rector A L, et al. Debugging OWL-DL Ontologies: A Heuristic Approach[ C]// Proc. of ISWC, 2005:745 - 757.
  • 4Schlobach S, Cornet R. Non-Standard Reasoning Services for the Debugging of Description Logic Terminologies [ C ].// Proc. of IJCAI, 2003: 355- 362.
  • 5Haase P, Harmelen F V, Huang Z, et al. A Framework for Handhng Inconsistency in Changing Ontologies[ C]//Proc. of ISWC, 2005: 353- 367.
  • 6Ma Y, Qi G, Hitzler P, et al. Measuring Inconsistency for Description Logics Based on Paraconsistent Semantics[ C] // Proc. of ECSQARU, 2007: 30-41.
  • 7Hunter A, Konieczny S. Measuring Inconsistency Through Minimal Inconsistent Sets[C]// Proc. of KR, 2008:358 - 366.
  • 8Qi G, Hunter A. Measuring Incoherence in Description Logic-Based Ontologies[ C] // Proc. of ISWC, 2007:381 - 394.
  • 9Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D, et al. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Application[ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 : 47 - 54.
  • 10Flouris G, Huang Z, Pan J Z, et al. Inconsistencies, Negations and Changes in Ontologies [ C ] // Proc. of AAAI, 2006: 1295- 1300.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部