摘要
目的为了准确的测定川盐中碘的含量,比较仲裁法和国标法测定川盐碘含量和测定碘酸钾标准物质中碘含量结果的差异。方法分别用仲裁法和国标法对抽取的288个样品及标准物质进行测定。结果288个样品的碘含量国标法和仲裁法测定结果的差异有统计学意义,碘酸钾标准物质结果差异无统计学意义。结论在食盐碘的测定中,对川盐的测定应用仲裁法能准确反映碘含量。
Objective To detect the iodine content in salt produced in Sichuan, and compare the difference on the iodine content detection by arbitration method and national standard method. Methods The detection of postassiun iodate standard material and other indicators in 288 samptes randomly collected was conducted by arbitration method and national standard method. Results The detection results by national standard method and arbitration method had significant difference, standard material. Conclusion Arbitration method but there was significant difference on potassium iodate could detect iodine content in the salt produced in Sichuan accurately .
出处
《预防医学情报杂志》
CAS
2009年第10期884-886,共3页
Journal of Preventive Medicine Information
关键词
仲裁法
国标法
碘盐
测定
Arbitration law
Internal standard method
Iodine
Detection