期刊文献+

FD法和故障树法在高压直流输电系统可靠性评估中的比较分析 被引量:4

Comparisons of FD Method and Fault Tree Method in Reliability Evaluation of HVDC Transmission System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 详细比较了高压直流输电系统可靠性评估中常用的频率和持续时间(FD)法和故障树法,分别给出了各自的优缺点。在子系统划分的基础上分别建立各子系统的状态空间图和故障树图,并加以层层组合,得到整个直流输电系统的状态空间模型和故障树模型。分别采用FD法和故障树法对一单12脉接线高压直流输电系统进行了算例对比分析,计算的可靠性指标包括双极运行、单极停运、双极停运对应的概率、频率、平均持续时间等。 A detailed comparison of frequency and duration (FD) method and fault tree method in the reliability evaluation of HVDC transmission system is presneted, and the differences between these two methods are proposed. Based on the sub - system division, the state space diagram and fault tree diagram for individual components, sub - systems and the whole HVDC transmission system are established step by step. A HVDC transmission system of single 12 -pulse is used as an example to demonstrate these two methods and the reliability indices for calculation includes the probability, the frequency, the duration and so on.
出处 《四川电力技术》 2009年第5期1-4,38,共5页 Sichuan Electric Power Technology
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAA02A21) 国家自然科学基金(50777067) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-05-0762) 重庆市自然科学基金重点项目(CSTS2008BC7031)
关键词 高压直流输电系统 FD法 故障树法 可靠性评估 HVDC transmission system frequency and duration (FD) method fault tree method reliability evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Billinton R, Allan R N, Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems[ M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1992.
  • 2陈永进,任震.模型组合及其在直流输电系统可靠性评估中的应用[J].电网技术,2004,28(13):18-22. 被引量:34
  • 3Kuruganty S. HVDC Transmission System Models for Power System Reliability Evaluation [ C ]. IEEE WESCANEX' 95 Conference proceedings, Wescanex, 1995,5 : 501 - 507.
  • 4Billinton R, Aboreshaid S. A Hybrid Deterministie/Probabilistic Technique for HVDC System Reliability Evaluation [ A]. 1997 Conference on Communications, Power and Computing[ C ]. WESCANEXPII Proceedings, Winnipeg MB, 1997, 5:35-40.
  • 5Billinton R, Fotuhi - Firuzabad M, Faried S O. Reliability Evaluation of Hybrid Multi - terminal HVDC Substation Systems[ J]. IEE Proceedings, Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2002, 149(5) : 571 - 577.
  • 6刘海涛,程林,孙元章,郑望其.交直流系统可靠性评估[J].电网技术,2004,28(23):27-31. 被引量:74
  • 7张静伟,任震,黄雯莹.直流系统可靠性故障树评估模型及应用[J].电力自动化设备,2005,25(6):62-65. 被引量:20
  • 8金星,洪延姬.工程系统可靠性数值计算方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2002.

二级参考文献16

  • 1陈永进,任震.模型组合及其在直流输电系统可靠性评估中的应用[J].电网技术,2004,28(13):18-22. 被引量:34
  • 2Billinton R, Allan R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems[M]. Boston, USA: Pitman, 1984.
  • 3Oliveria G C. A technique for reducing computational effort in Monte Carlo based composite reliability evaluation[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1989, 4(4): 1309-1315.
  • 4Fotuhi-Firuzabad H, Billinton R, Faried S O. Incorporating a DC link in composite system reliability evaluation[C]. IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2000, 3: 1760-1765.
  • 5任震 冉立.电力系统可靠性评估的Monte Carlo方法——系统状态及其转移过程的随机模拟[J].重庆大学学报,1988,11(4):20-28.
  • 6BILLINTON R,ALLAN R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems[M]. Boston,USA:Pitman,1984.
  • 7黄金凤.基于FD-Monte Carlo混合法的大型交直流混合输电系统可靠性评估[D].广州:华南理工大学,2002.HUANG Jin-feng. The reliability evaluation of bulk HVAC / HVDC hybrid transmission system based on FD-Monte Carlo methods [ D ]. Guangzhou :South China University of Technology, 2002.
  • 8Guizhou-Guangdong + / -500 kV DC Transmission Project,Appendix2 to study report availability and reliability. 2002,2.
  • 9天广直流输电工程交直流并联输电系统可靠性评估项目研究报告.华南理工电力学院,中国南方电力联营公司,2001.
  • 10BILLINTON R,ALLAN R N. Reliability evaluation of power systems[M]. Boston,USA:Pitman, 1984.

共引文献104

同被引文献81

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部