摘要
达米特认为形而上学陈述是关于实在图像刻画的"争论的陈述类"(Disputed class of statements),所以提供一种支配这些陈述的逻辑规律的意义理论就成为必要;而选择合适的语义理论作为基础,乃是构建这种意义理论的第一步。他在《形而上学的逻辑基础》中,提出了一种辩护主义的意义理论。文章通过指称和涵义来论证达米特在对弗雷格—塔斯基经典语义理论的批判并提出"直觉主义的内在解释"时,已经开始拒斥实在论,所以达米特作为意义理论基础的"语义理论"需要在反实在论的前提下来理解;这和"真"的直觉主义理解以及直觉主义逻辑规律的自我辩护是一致的。
Michael Dummett argues that the statement of metaphysical issues are disputed class of statements what concern of realities' charactering,so it is necessary to provide a theory of meaning which masters logical law of those statements;Meanwhile,for establishing this theory,it is the first step to choose a suitable semantic theory as basis.In 《the logical basis of metaphysics 》,He develops a meaning theory of justification.This article accounts from Dummett's discussion of sense and reference,and argues that when Dummett criticized the classical theory of meaning and advanced an internal interpretation of intuitionism,he have rejected the realism.So we should grasp the semantic theory as the basis of theory of meaning from the perspective of anti-realism,which accords with intuitionism explanation of truth and the self-justification of intuitionism logical law.
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期35-40,共6页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature