期刊文献+

激励股权分布结构对股权激励绩效的影响——基于中国上市公司的实证研究 被引量:7

On Relationship Between Incentive Stock Structure and Firms′ Performances—An Empirical Study Based on Listed Firms in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用我国资本市场2005~2007年的数据,分析了上市公司的激励股权分布结构以及其与股权激励绩效的关系。研究发现:核心高管激励股权的绝对差距和相对差距、以及高管总体激励股权的相对差距与股权激励绩效之间呈显著的负相关关系,此外公司规模和监事会规模对股权激励绩效呈正相关关系。故我国上市公司应注意构建较为平均的激励股权分布结构,辅以扩大公司的经营规模,充分发挥监事会的作用,来提升股权激励绩效。 In this paper, an empirical research was conducted on the relationship between the firms' performance and the structure of incentive stock. It was found that there was a negative relationship between TMT stock incentive absolute and relative gaps and TMT overall stock incentive relative gaps and future firms' performance. Besides, a positive relationship was witnessed between firm size and supervisory board size and firms' performance. It was argued that the listed firms in China should pay attention to constructing a more equilibratory stock incentive distribution structure and enlarging firms' operation scales and giving full play of supervisory board in order to get better firms' performance.
作者 何凡
出处 《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第3期44-49,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 激励股权 激励股权分布结构 股权激励绩效 Stock Incentive Structure of Incentive Stock Firms' Performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献82

  • 1唐鑛,石巧蓉.粤、辽两地上市公司高管薪酬差距[J].经济管理,2006,32(1):64-66. 被引量:2
  • 2廖建桥,张凌,刘智强.基尼系数与企业内部薪酬分配合理性研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(2):98-105. 被引量:20
  • 3Borokhovich, Panino and Trapani, Outside Directors and CEO Selection.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), pp. 337--355.
  • 4Hermalin, Weisbach, The Determinants of Board Composition. Rand Journal of Economics 19 (1988), pp. 589-606.
  • 5Hermalin, Weisbach, The Effects of Board Composition and Directors Incentives on Firm Performance. Financial Management, 20 (1992), pp. 101--112.
  • 6Jensen and Murphy, Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentive. Journad of Politicial Economy, 3 (1990), pp. 225--264.
  • 7Lipton, Lorsch, A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48. no. 1, 1992, pp. 59--77.
  • 8Wu, Yili, Honey, I Shrunk the Board, Working Paper, 2000, University of Chicago.
  • 9Yermack, Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Jounud of Financial Economis, 40(1996), pp. 185--211.
  • 10Jesen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., 1976: Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3, No.4, 5-20.

共引文献1632

同被引文献98

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部