汉语“有"字句与泰语“■”字句的对比研究

A Comparison between Chinese "有" Sentences and Thai "■" Sentences

文章把汉语里常用的＂有＂字句和泰语里的＂■＂字句进行对比后发现：表＂存在＂和＂领有＂的＂有＂字句和泰语里的＂a＂字句大致对应;表＂估量＂、＂比较＂的＂有＂字句和＂■＂字句不完全对应;表示＂发生或出现＂的＂有＂字句和＂动词＋有＂用法在泰语里没有对应的形式。汉语里的＂有＂后可附动态助词＂着＂、＂了＂、＂过＂,泰语里＂■＂的后面没有相应的动态助词,汉语里＂有＂的状语都在它的前面,而＂■＂的状语有的在前,有的在后。结合上面的结论,本文提出了促进正迁移,避免负迁移的教学对策。

Through a comparison of Chinese＂有＂sentences and Thai＂■＂ sentences,the paper hasreached the following conclusion：＂有＂sentences which express＂existence＂or＂possession＂roughly corre-spond to Thai＂■＂sentences;＂有＂sentences which express＂estimation＂or＂comparison＂correspond toThai＂■＂sentences to a certain degree;＂有＂sentences which express＂emergence＂and＂verb ＋有＂phrase don’t eorrespond to Thai＂■＂sentences.In Chinese,＂有＂can be followed by such auxiliary words as＂zhe（着）＂,＂ le（了）＂and＂guo（过）＂,while＂■＂cannot.The adverbial is always put before ＂有＂ while in the ＂ ＂ sentences the adverbial can be put either before or after ＂ ＂. With this, the research brings up the teaching strategies for quickening positive transfer and avoiding negative transfer.