期刊文献+

基于沉淀成本视角的企业重组博弈分析 被引量:5

Sunk Cost Approach to Gaming of Firm Restructuring
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从放松新古典完全竞争市场中没有沉淀成本的假设前提入手,在区分固定成本和沉淀成本概念的基础上,运用一个有无沉淀成本的古诺纳什均衡经济模型分析它们各自对企业重组的经济效率和福利水平的不同影响,进而发现,沉淀成本而不是固定成本(规模经济或企业规模)是影响企业重组经济效率和福利水平最基本的经济变量。依据这样的经济模型,我们发现,在国有企业重组过程中,因资产专用性、交易成本和生产过程等原因,沉淀成本普遍存在,严重降低了国有企业重组的经济效率和福利水平。因此,为了提高国有企业重组的经济效率,我们提供制度创新或政策创新的基本原则,关键在于减少或补偿沉淀成本,促进生产要素充分流动,从而创造出一个可竞争的市场经济环境。 The paper is to relax the assumptions of neoclassic perfect competition and contestable paradigm, and build up a simple economic model. We analyze the consequence of firm restructuring in terms of the difference between sunk and fixed costs. The production possibility curve and indifference curve are to distinguish between the effect of the null and positive sunk costs on firm restructuring. As a result we have found that,not fixed costs,but sunk costs,are the only economic factor that influences the economic efficiency and welfare of firm restructuring. Additionally we apply the economic model to the state-owned enterprise restructuring and provide the solutions to sunk cost barriers,that is, reduce or recover the sunk costs to promote the factor mobility,including market institution perfection, reduction of transaction cost under non-market institution and govemment interventions towards sunk cost management.
作者 汤吉军
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第10期118-126,共9页 China Industrial Economics
基金 吉林大学交叉学科前沿创新项目"法律 融资环境对我国企业成长的影响研究"(批准号2008JC003) 国家社会科学基金项目"资源枯竭地区经济转型和可持续发展研究"(批准号08CJY021)
关键词 固定成本 沉淀成本 国有企业 重组博弈 fixed cost sunk cost state-owned enterprise restructuring game
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Asplund,M. What Fraction of a Capital Investment Is Sunk Costs[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,2000,(48).
  • 2Bain, J. Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequence in Manufacturing Industries[M]. Cambridge : Harvard University Press, 1956.
  • 3Baumol,W. Free Market Innovation Machine:Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press ,2002.
  • 4Baumol,W.J.,and R.D.Willig. Fixed Costs,Sunk Costs,Entry Barriers and Sustainability of Monopoly [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1981, (96).
  • 5Baumol,W.J. et al. Contestable Market and the Theory of Industry Structure [M]. New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.
  • 6Dusgupta, P.,and J.Stiglitz. Sunk Costs,Competition and Welfare[M]. Cambridge: St John's College, 1985.
  • 7Dixit,A.,and R. Pindyck. Investment under Uncertainty[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 8Eaton,B.,and R.G. Lipsey. Exit Barriers Are Entry Barriers:The Durability of Capital as a Barrier to Entry[J].Bell Journal of Economics, 1980,10(2).
  • 9Gilbert,R.N. Mobility Barriers and the Value of Incumbency [A]. R.Schmalensee, and R.Willig. Handbook of Industrial Organization[C]. Amsterdam:North-Holland,1989.
  • 10Kessides,I.N. Market Concentration,Contestability,and Sunk Costs[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1990, (72).

二级参考文献30

  • 1史正富.投资分配和产业结构[J].经济研究,1986,21(3):3-11. 被引量:2
  • 2杜海燕,郭晋刚.自主权、激励机制和企业效率与行为[J].经济研究参考,1992(Z6):367-375. 被引量:1
  • 3狄娜.国营工业企业潜亏惊人[J].经济研究参考,1992(Z1):976-982. 被引量:1
  • 4迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].华夏出版社,1997..
  • 5WH纽曼等著 武鸿麟译.企业战略[M].贵州:贵州人民出版社,1986..
  • 6罗宾逊 伊特韦尔.《现代经济学导论》[M].商务印书馆,1997年.第114页.
  • 7Williamson, O E,Antitrust.Economics: Mergers, Contractlng. and.Strategic.Behavior [J] . Basil Blackwell,1987.
  • 8Jones C Hestedy S W & Borgatti,P S A General Theory of Network Governance:Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms [J] . Academy of Management Review,1997,22 (4) .
  • 9Burt,R S.Structural Holes:the Social Streture of Competition [ M] . Cambridge,MA:Harvad Business School Press,1992.
  • 10Axelrod,R.The Evolution of Cooperation [ M] . New York:Basic Books,1984.

共引文献174

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部