期刊文献+

独立量刑程序的价值分析 被引量:3

Value Analysis on the Procedure of Independent Measurement of Penalty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 量刑程序是指与定罪程序相对而言的,在刑事诉讼中用来解决如何对被告人裁量决定刑罚的所有程序和制度的总称。在法制日益健全的当代社会,阳光司法呼声日益高涨,随着刑事庭审改革方式的日益深入,构建独立量刑程序已经成为一种必然趋势,因为独立量刑程序具有目的性价值和工具性价值双重功能,有助于正确量刑,维护被告人正当权利。 Compared with the procedure of declaring guilty, the procedure of measurement of penalty is a general concept of all procedure and system which decides penalty of defend in criminal procedure. In the contemporary society of legal system, the administration of justice is disclosed. With the deepening of the criminal trial reform, constructing the procedure of independent measurement of penalty has already become an inevitable trend, because the procedure of independent measurement of penalty has purpose value, tool value and efficiency value. The procedure of independent measurement of penalty is benifit to correct criminal measurement and protect defendant's legal right.
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期191-195,共5页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 独立量刑程序 目的性价值 工具性价值 效益价值 the procedure of independent measurement of penalty purpose value tool value efficiency value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张明楷.刑法学[M].法律出版社,1997.18.
  • 2[韩]李在祥.韩国刑法总论[M].中国人民大学出版社,2005.314,315.
  • 3[日]福田平,大爆仁.李乔,等译.日本刑法总论讲义[M].辽宁人民出版社,1988.234.
  • 4马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集·第19卷[M].人民出版社,1956.406.
  • 5常怡.民事程序价值之管见[J].现代法学,1999,21(2):13-18. 被引量:27
  • 6季卫东.法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993(1):83-103. 被引量:745
  • 7Melvin Eisenberg. Participation, Responsiveness, and the consultative process [ J ]. ( US ) Harvard Law Review ( 1978 ) , Vol, 92, pp. 411 - 412.
  • 8[美]波斯纳.蒋兆康译.法律的经济分析[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997.29.

二级参考文献16

  • 1John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 2Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 3Gunther Teubner."Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law"Law and Society Review,1983.
  • 4MilsomSF.
  • 5Michael D.Bayles.Procedural Justice, Allocating to Individuals,1990.
  • 6J.Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action,1987.
  • 7O. F. Robinsom and others.An Introduction to European Legal History,1985.
  • 8A. Engelmann and others.A History of Continental Civil Procedure,1927.
  • 9Morton J Horwitz.The transformation of American law,1977.
  • 10Justice William O.Douglas’s Comment in Joint Anti – Fascist Refugee Comm. v. Mcgrath, see United States Supreme Court Reports (95 Law. Ed. Oct. 1950 Term),1951.

共引文献829

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部