期刊文献+

胸水多项肿瘤标志物联合检测的临床价值 被引量:4

The Clinical Value of Detecting Tumor Multi-Markers in Pleural Effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨胸水中多项肿瘤标志物的联合检测对鉴别癌性胸水、炎性胸水的临床价值,以提高癌性胸水的确诊率。方法:采用FJ2008P放免计数器测定40例癌性胸水和51例炎性胸水中的CEA、CA125、SF三种肿瘤标志物含量,进行对比分析。结果:癌性胸水组中CEA、CA125、SF三种肿瘤标志物平均水平明显高于正常值高限,炎性胸水组平均水平低于正常值(P<0.05),肿瘤标志物癌性胸水组阳性率95.00%,炎性胸水组25.48%(P<0.05)。结论:胸水CEA、CA125、SF三种肿瘤标志物联合检测对鉴别良恶性胸水有临床价值。 Objective: To study the clinical value of tumor multi - markers in cancer pleural effusion differing from inflammatory pleural effusion, so as to heighten identification level, to improve diagnosis ability of cancer pleural effusion. Methods:Took RIA counter FJ2008P;there were 40 cases of cancer pleural effusion and 51 cases of inflammatory pleural effusion were analyzed in the CEA, CA125, SF [ three of tumor markers]. Results:CEA, CA125, SF levels of cancer pleura1 effusion group were significantly higher than that of normal average high limit, inflammatory pleural effusion group were below the normal average level (P 〈 0. 05 );cancer pleural effusion group had positive rate of 95.00 percent, Inflammatory hydrothorax Group 25.48% ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion : CEA, CA125, SF of tumor markers in Hydrothorax should be combined detection ; three tumor markers for identification of benign and malignant pleura] effusion all have clinical value.
作者 易智勇
出处 《现代临床医学》 2009年第5期340-341,共2页 Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
关键词 胸水 肿瘤标志物 联合检测 Pleural effusion Tumor markers Combined detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1高云朝,王美琴,陆云,程伟,张学平,刘兴党,林祥通.血清肿瘤标志物的检测对肺癌患者的诊断价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2005,28(4):268-269. 被引量:32
  • 2刘宏新,陈达强.胸水与血清铁蛋白测定对恶性胸水诊断的价值[J].临床荟萃,1997,12(4):179-180. 被引量:16
  • 3陈智周 范振符 等.糖类抗原CA-50放射免疫抑制试验在肿瘤诊断和监测中的初步应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1987,9:436-436.
  • 4[1]Alatas F,Alatas O,Metintas M,et al.Diagnostic value of CEA,CA 15-3,CA 19-9,CYFRA 21-1,NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions[J].Lung Cancer,2001,31(1):9-16.
  • 5[2]Shitrit D,Zingerman B,Shitrit AB,et al.Diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1,CEA,CA 19-9,CA 15-3,and CA 125 assays in pleural effusions:analysis of 116 cases and review of the literature[J].Oncologist,2005,10 (7):501-507.
  • 6[3]Lee JH,Chang JH.Diagnostic utility of serum and pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen,neuron-specific enolase,and cytokeratin 19 fragments in patients with effusions from primary lung cancer[J].Chest,2005,128(4):2298-2303.
  • 7[5]Trapé J,Molina R,Sant F.Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of tumor markers in fluid and serum and their ratio in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions[J].Tumour Biol,2004,25(5-6):276-281.
  • 8[6]Satoh H,Ishikawa H,Yamashita YT,et al.Yamashita,et al.Pleural to serum CEA ratio in lung adenocarcinoma[J].Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol),2002,14(2):178-179.
  • 9[7]Hernández L,Espasa A,Fernández C,et al.CEA and CA 549 in serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusion[J].Lung Cancer,2002,36(1):83-89.
  • 10[9]Schneider J,Velcovsky HG,Morr H,et al.Comparison of the tumor markers tumor M2-PK,CEA,CYFRA 21-1,NSE and SCC in the diagnosis of lung cancer[J].Anticancer Res,2000,20(6D):5053-5058.

共引文献44

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部