期刊文献+

王弼之“无”作为本体的具体含义新探

The Specific Meaning of Wang Bi's "Nothingness" as Ontology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 王弼将"无"描述和规定为不可名的、非物质性的、绝对的、单一的、超时空性的和无限的。"无"在王弼的哲学思想中完全是形而上的范畴,是万物的本体。但"无"仅仅是万物之所以能够产生和存在的依据、条件,它是万物之所以"存在"的根据,而不是万物之所以"是"的根据。王弼以"无"为本,同时以"无"为用,"体用不二"是其本体的思维方式。 From the description and the restriction of Wang Bi, we can see that "nothingness" can not be named, and has non-material nature, with the absolute, single and boundless characteristics, which indicate that "nothingness" at thought of Wang Bi's philosophy is entirely a metaphysical category. It can be the ontology of all things. But this metaphysical "nothingness" as the Ontology just means: it is the reason of all "existence", rather than the reason of all "being". "Nothingness" is just the causes and conditions that things can arise. Just in this sense, Wang Bi's "'nothingness' as ontology of all things" at the same time is "used 'nothingness' to do". It shows an ontology structure of metaphysical thinking set up by Wang Bi-the ontology and the role of ontology are not-separated.
作者 陈瑞新
出处 《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第3期16-19,共4页 Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 形而上者 本体 “存在” nothingness metaphysics ontology existence
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献9

  • 1亚里士多德 吴寿彭译.《形而上学》[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996年版.第305-306页.
  • 2.《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M].人民出版社,1972年版.第362页.
  • 3陈康.《论希腊哲学》[M].商务印书馆,1990年版.第2页.
  • 4A.C.Graham,Disputers of the Tao,La Sane:Open Court,1989,D.412.
  • 5孙周兴.《形而上学问题》[M].,..
  • 6陈嘉映.《恩远道》[M].福建教育出版社,2000年版.第164页.
  • 7.《智者篇》[M].,.237.
  • 8贺麟译.《小逻辑》[M].商务印书馆,1981年版.前言第ⅩⅩ页.
  • 9G S Kirk等编.The Presocratic Philosophers,2nd.ed..Cambridge,1983.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部