CVM在崆峒山非使用价值评估中的应用被引量：6

The Application of Contingent Valuation Method In Evaluating Non-Use Values of Kongtong Mountain

下载PDF

导出

摘要条件价值评估法(CVM)是非市场价值评估技术中应用最广、影响最大的一种方法。采用CVM评估了崆峒山2005年的非使用价值,并于不同时段采用同样的调查问卷对崆峒山游客进行大量调查,对CVM进行了有效性和可靠性检验。 The Contingent Valuation Method is the most significant approach of non - market valuation technique and has been using most widely. Using the CVM evaluated Non - Use value of Kongtong Mountain in 2005. Based on investigating a number of tourists of Kongtong Mountain using the same questionnaires, tested the validity and reliability of CVM.

作者贾艳琴

机构地区兰州商学院农林经济管理学院

出处《安徽农学通报》 2009年第19期1-3,共3页 Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin

基金 2009年兰州商学院科研项目(0909057):甘肃省旅游资源开发的环境经济损益分析与研究

关键词条件价值法(CVM) 支付意愿非使用价值评估崆峒山 Contingent valuation method Willingness to pay Non -Use value Kongtong Mountain

分类号 F590.7 [经济管理—旅游管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献6

1刘亚萍,金建湘,潘晓芳.生态旅游区非使用价值的评估方法——CVM法[J].绿色中国（理论版）,2005(07M):39-42. 被引量：10
2薛达元,ClemTisdell.环境物品的经济价值评估方法:条件价值法[J].农村生态环境,1999,15(3):39-43. 被引量：42
3张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报（自然科学版）,2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量：128
4陈浮,张捷.旅游价值货币化核算研究——九寨沟案例分析[J].南京大学学报（自然科学版）,2001,37(3):296-303. 被引量：58
5郭剑英,王乃昂.敦煌旅游资源非使用价值评估[J].资源科学,2005,27(5):187-192. 被引量：52
6张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):454-463. 被引量：247

二级参考文献108

1杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量：19
2[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
3[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
4[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
5[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
6[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
7[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
8[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.
9[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335.
10[20]Hanemann W M. The economic theory of WTP and WTA [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.42-96.