期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

培养创新型、多层次、专业化的工程科技人才--CDIO工程教育改革的人才理念和培养模式 被引量：124

Cultivating Innovative,Multi-level and Professional Engineering Personnel
原文传递
导出
摘要 高等工程教育在培养工程科技人才,提高中国在工程科技领域的竞争力中发挥着重要的作用。在中国建设创新型国家和走新型工业化道路的背景下,培养大量具有创新能力、多层次和专业化的工程科技人才具有重大的战略意义。本文分析了专业人才的定义、特点和不足,总结出工程科技人才成长的多层次、专业化、社会性、长期性和流动性等培养规律,并以此为理论框架,结合美国麻省理工学院CDIO工程教育模式在知识、技能和实践方面的人才理念,提出了中国在工程科技人才的培养上需要关注的问题和相关建议。我们认为,工程科技人才的培养需要学校、政府和企业全面合作,通过丰富教育资源、优化教育环节、完善教育环境,切实提高高等工程教育的质量和水平,实现人才培养目标。 Higher engineering education plays a key role in cultivating and in enhancing competitiveness in engineering field. China now is on the way of constructing itself an innovative one and taking a new road to industrialization. Under this background, it is of strategic significance to cultivate a large number of innovative, multi-level and professional engineering personnel. This research analyzes the definition, characteristics and drawbacks of professional talents and summarizes the regularities in the process of cultivating engineering personnel, it argues that the process should be professional, multi-level, social, long-term and fluid. Based on this theoretical framework, and the talent concept of the CDIO model created by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology （MIT） in knowledge, techniques and practice, the paper points out the problems in the cultivation of engineering qualified scientists and technicians and correspondingly puts forward some useful suggestions. It also holds that the cultivation of qualified engineering talents needs all-around integrative efforts from universities, government and industry so as to enrich resources, optimize education process and improve the quality of China＇ s engineering and technology experts.
作者 雷环 汤威颐 Edward F.Crawley
机构地区 清华大学教育研究院 MIT航空航天系 MIT Gordon MIT航空航天工程系 美国工程院 英国皇家工程院 瑞典皇家工程院
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期29-35,共7页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
关键词 工程教育 专业人才 CDIO 人才培养
分类号 G642.0 [文化科学—高等教育学] TB1 [一般工业技术]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1《中华人民共和国教育部2006年教育统计数据》,http:∥www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/45/info33545.htm.
  • 2Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R., Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York, 2007, p2,694,51,257.
  • 3Ericsson, K.A. 2006.. An Introduction to Cambridge Handbook of expertise and Expert Performance: Its Development,Organization, and Content. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance. edited by Ed. Ericsson, K.A., N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 1, p3-19,3,689.
  • 4Connell, M.W., K. Sheridan, and H. Gardner. 2003. On Abilities and Domains. In The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, edited by R.J. Stemberg and E.L. Grigorenko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 5, p126 - 155.
  • 5Chi, M.T.H. 2007. Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics, in The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance, edited by Ed. Ericsson, K. A., N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 2.
  • 6Mayer, Pt. E. 2003. What Causes Individual Differences in Cognitive Performance? In The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise, edited by R.J. Steinberg and E.L. Grigorenko, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 10, p265.
  • 7Feltovich, P.J., M.J. Prietula, and K.A. Ericsson. 2006. Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance, edited by Ed. Ericsson, K. A., N. Chamess, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 4, p47.
  • 8American Seeiety of Mechanical Engineers, Society Policy Ethic, Revised on November 5, 2006, http://files. asme. org/ASMEORG/ Governance/3675. pdf.
  • 9Weisberg, R.W. 2006, Modes of Expertise in Creative Thinking, in The Canlbridge Handbook of Expertise and Performance, edited by Ed. Ericsson, K.A., N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 42, p761 - 787.
  • 10Chi, M. T. H. 2005. Laboratory Methods for Assessing Experts' and Novices' Knowledge. in The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Perfomlance, edited by Ed. Ericsson, K.A., N. Chamess, P. J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., Chapter 10, 167- 184.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund,, S., & Brodeur, D. R., Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York, 2007.
  • 2The Boeing Company, "Desired Attributes of an Engineer", 1996. Available at http: // www. boeing, com/companyoffices/pwu/attributes/att fibutes/html.
  • 3Mackay, A. L., Dictionary of Scientific Quotations, Hilger, London, 1994.
  • 4Private communication of R. I-ester and M. Boyce, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Education, Committee on Strategic Planning. 2008.
  • 5Institution of Civil Engineers, The Royal Charter, London, 1828. Available at http://www, ice. org. uk.
  • 6Department of Biological Engineering, "The 4M Model", 2007. Available athttp://web, mit. edu/be/index, htm.
  • 7Group T University College, "The 5E Model", Leuven, Belgium, 2008. Available athttp:// www. groupt, be/www/bachelor-programs/ vision-of-engineering/key - terms - the - 5 - es/.
  • 8Finiston, M. Engineering Our Future: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the EngineeringProfession, HMSO CMND, London,1980.
  • 9Gordon, B. M. , "What is an Engineer?" Invited keynote presentation. Annual Conference of the European Society for the Formation of Engineers (SEFI), University of Erlangen - Numberg, 1984.
  • 10Center for Occupational Research and Development, "What is Contextual teaming?" Available at http://www, cord. org.

共引文献124

同被引文献681

引证文献124

二级引证文献1331

高等工程教育研究
2009年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部