期刊文献+

可重复的成套神经心理状态测量(RBANS)在社区老人中的信度和效度研究 被引量:6

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) in Community Elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价可重复的成套神经心理状态测量(Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status,RBANS)中文版的信度和效度。方法:对49名上海市社区老人分别于8周前后进行RBANS和简易智能状态量表(Mini-Mental State Examination,MMSE)的评定。结果:①RBANS的内部一致性较好;重测相关系数为0.933(P<0.001)。②RBANS与MMSE的相关系数为0.675;RBANS具有良好的结构,χ2为73.52,NNFI、CFI均大于0.9,5个潜变量因素负荷系数均具有统计学意义,测量数据与5因素模型之间拟合良好;RBANS的区分度为0.263。③RBANS总分与年龄负相关(r=-0.536,P<0.001),与教育程度正相关(r=0.744,P<0.001),与性别相关无统计学意义(r=-0.192,P>0.05)。结论:RBANS中文版在社区老人中具有较好的信度和效度。 Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Methods: 49 community elderly from Shanghai were rated with RBANS and MMSE separately before and after 8 weeks. Results: ①The retest coefficient of RBANS was 0.933. ②The correlative coefficient between total scores of RBANS and MMSE were 0.675. The construct of RBANS was good, χ^2= 73.52, NNFI=0.91, CFI=0.94. The discrimination of RBANS was 0.263.③RBANS total score had significant correlation with age and education, but not with sex. Conclusion: The Chinese version of RBANS has relatively good reliability and validity in community elderly.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2009年第5期535-537,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30770769) 上海市自然科学基金(06ZR14086) 上海市预防精神医学学科建设子项目(05Ⅲ028-09)资助
关键词 RBANS 神经心理 信度 效度 RBANS Neuropsychology Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Randolph C,Tierney MC,Mohr E,et al. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1998,20(3): 310-319.
  • 2Gold JM, Queern C, Iannone VN, et al. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, Ⅰ: Sensitivity, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry, 1999,156(12): 1944-1950.
  • 3Gontkovsky ST, Mold JW, Beatty WW. Age and educational influences on RBANS index scores in a nondemented geriatric sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist,2002,16 (3): 258-263.
  • 4Duff K, Patton D,Schoenberg MR, et al. Age and education corrected independent normative data for the RBANS in a community dwelling elderly sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2003,17(3) : 351-366.
  • 5Beatty WW,Mold JW,Gontkovsky ST. RBANS performance: Influences of sex and education. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,2003,25(8): 1065-1069.
  • 6王征宇,张明园.中文版简易智能状态检查(MMSE)的应用[J].上海精神医学,1989,7(3):108-111. 被引量:156
  • 7张保华,谭云龙,张五芳,等.重复性成套神经心理状态测验的信度、效度分析.西安:2008年全国精神卫生预防及康复联合学术会议资料汇编,2008.10,116-117.
  • 8Gontkovsky ST,Beatty WW,Mold JW. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in a normal, geriatric sample. Clinical Gerontologist, 2004,27(3) : 79-86.
  • 9Woodford HJ,George J. Cognitive assessment in the elderly: A review of clinical methods. Q J Med,2007,100(8): 469-484.
  • 10Schoenberg MR, Duff K, Beglinger LJ, et al. Retention rates on RBANS memory subtests in elderly adults. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 2008,21 (1) : 26-33.

共引文献155

同被引文献75

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部