摘要
目的:探索Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表(RRS)的信效度及其在中国的适用情况。方法:采用反刍思维量表、抑郁、焦虑、自尊、神经质、生活满意度量表,对912名大学本科生施测。结果:验证性因素分析结果χ2=2610.43(df=231)、RMSEA=0.068、GFI=0.87、AGFI=0.86、NNFI=0.82、CFI=0.83、IFI=0.83,各项指标表明原量表模型是可以接受的。RRS总量表α系数0.90,重测信度0.82,各因子α系数在0.68-0.85间,重测信度在0.63-0.80间。在抑郁症状反刍、强迫思考和总量表得分上性别差异显著,女性更倾向于反刍思维。结论:RRS中文版适合在中国本科生中使用。
Objective： To explore the reliability and validity of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese version. Methods： A total of 912 Chinese college students completed the RRS. Results： All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including χ^2,RMSEA,GFI,AGFI,NNFI,CFI,IFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The α coefficients of the scale and subseales and test-retest reliabilities were over 0.63. There was gender difference in rumination level. Conclusion： RRS is appropriate for the assessment of rumination in Chinese colleges.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
2009年第5期550-551,549,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词
RRS
反刍思维
信度
效度
性别差异
RRS
Rumination
Reliability
Validity
Gender difference
