摘要
震区哄抢事件引发了公众对于灾民哄抢行为罪与非罪界定的讨论,紧急避险和权利冲突理论告诉我们极穷状态下的哄抢行为并非犯罪,因为此时对生命的尊重与保障处于最为优先的地位,而划清罪与非罪界限的关键节点则在于对极穷权的边界进行限定。
The incident of "tents were looted"sparked public concerns of the victims of the earthquake:whether their behaviors constitute a crime.Theory of emergency and conflict of rights tell us their behaviors in desperate state do not constitute the crime,because the respect for life and security in the desperate state are of the highest priority,and the key point is how to define the limited boundaries of the right to desperate state.
出处
《西部法学评论》
2009年第5期84-88,共5页
Western Law Review
关键词
极穷权
权利冲突
紧急避险
限定性条件
The right to desperate state
Rights conflict
Emergency
Limited boundaries