司法裁定既判力的法理分析

On the Jurisprudential Analyses of Res Judicata of the Verdict

确立司法判决既判力的理论和制度,是为了避免对同一诉讼标的形成相互抵触和矛盾的判决,以稳定当事人之间的民事实体权利义务关系,最终达到维护国家司法权威的目的。无论法学理论界亦或是司法实务界都认为,法院裁判当事人之间实体法律关系的终局判决具有既判力;而对于法院在司法过程中作出的裁定是否具有既判力这一问题,理论上和实践中都有争议。研究法院在司法过程中裁定的既判力问题有助于完善诉讼理论和指导司法实践,具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。

That the theory and the system of res judicata is established in the civil procedure law is to avoid bringing a paradoxical judgment and the former judgment that the judicature has formed about the same object of action so as to stabilize the civil substantive relation about right and obligation between the parties, and to maintain the judicial authority of nation at last. Not only the jurisprudential circles but also the judicial world think that the final judgment that the court has adjudicated the substantive legal relation between the parties has res judicata, but about whether the verdict has res judicata or not is a controversy question in theory and in practice, for this reason , to study the question about res judicata of verdict conduce to perfect litigation theories and to instruct judicatory practice, and has important theoretical value and practical meaning.