期刊文献+

液基细胞学检测技术和传统细胞学涂片对肺癌的诊断价值比较 被引量:13

Comparison between Values of Liquid-based Cytology Test and Conventional Smear in Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较液基细胞学检测(liquid-based cytology test,LCT)技术和传统细胞学涂片(coventional smear,CS)检测不同标本对肺癌的诊断价值。方法研究标本包括痰液、胸腔积液、支气管黏膜刷检物、肺泡灌洗液和肺细针吸活检标本。对比上述两种方法诊断肺癌的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值;并分析两种方法的涂片质量和检出的癌细胞的形态结构。结果LCT法检测痰液、胸腔积液、支气管黏膜刷检物、支气管肺泡灌洗液、细针吸活检标本对诊断肺癌的敏感度分别为28.6%、37.5%、37.5%、30.0%、87.5%;准确度分别为65.2%、75.0%、62.1%、57.6%、91.5%;阴性预测值分别为59.6%、70.6%、51.0%、48.1%、78.9%;CS法检测痰液、胸腔积液、支气管黏膜刷检物、支气管肺泡灌洗液、细针吸活检标本诊断肺癌的敏感度分别为14.3%、12.5%、22.5%、15.0%、75.0%;准确度分别为58.3%、65.0%、53.0%、48.5%、83.0%;阴性预测值分别为55.1%、63.2%、45.6%、43.3%、65.2%。LCT法在涂片质量、癌细胞形态学判断方面较CS法好。结论LCT法检测痰液、胸腔积液、支气管黏膜刷检物、支气管肺泡灌洗液及肺细针吸活检物诊断肺癌的敏感度、准确度、阴性预测值均较CS法高,故LCT法对肺癌的诊断价值高于CS法,涂片质量也明显优于CS法。 Objective To compare the values of liquid-based cytology test(LCT) and conventional smear(CS) in diagnosis of lung cancer.Methods The researched specimens included sputum,pleural effusion,bronchial mucosa brush biopsy,alveolar lavage fluid and lung fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,negative predictive value were compared between 2 methods in diagnosis of lung cancer,and the quality of smear and the detected cancer cell morphology were analyzed.Results The sensitivities of LCT in detecting sputum,pleural effusion,bronchoscopy mucosa brush biopsy,bronchoalveolar lavage fluid,fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens were 28.6%,37.5%,37.5%,30.0%,87.5%,respectively;the accuracy 65.2%,75.0%,62.1%,57.6%,91.5%,respectively;negative predictive value 59.6%,70.6%,51.0%,48.1%,78.9%,respectively;the sensitivities of CS method were 14.3%,12.5%,22.5%,15.0%,75.0%,respectively;the accuracy 58.3%,65.0%,53.0%,48.5%,83.0%,respectively,negative predictive value 55.1%,63.2%,45.6%,43.3%,65.2%,respectively.Conclusion The sensitivity,accuracy and negative predictive value of LCT method are higher than those of CS in detecting sputum,pleural effusion bronchial mucosa brush biopsy,bronchoalveolar lavage specimens and lung fine-needle aspiration biopsy.So LCT method is superior to CS in smear quality and judgment of cancer cell morphology.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第20期1849-1851,共3页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 肺肿瘤 组织细胞学制备技术 诊断 敏感性与特异性 液基细胞学 传统涂片 Lung neoplasms Histocytological preparation techniques Diagnosis Sensitivity and specificity Liquid-based cytology Conventional smear
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1黄雪霞,周新力,孔欣,施玉兰,郭培奋.液基细胞学检查在诊断宫颈病变中的临床应用[J].广东医学,2005,26(4):542-543. 被引量:1
  • 2张威,梅平,刘艳辉,庄恒国,曾仁海,陈国艳.液基细胞学与传统巴氏涂片对普查人群宫颈病变筛查的比较[J].广东医学,2005,26(5):640-641. 被引量:17
  • 3Gabriel C, Achten R, Drijkoningen M. Use of liquid- based cytology in serous fluids: a comparison with conventional cytopreparatory techniques [J]. Acta Cytol, 2004, 48 (6): 825-835.
  • 4Piaton E, Faynel J, Hutin K, et al. Conventional liquid - based tech- niques versus cytyc ThinPrep processing of urinary samples : a qualitative approach [J]. BMC Clin Pathol, 2005, 5 (1): 9-16.
  • 5Cochand- Priollet B, Prat JJ, Polivka M, et al. Thyroid fine needle aspiration: the morphological features on ThinPrep slide preparations. Eighty cases with histological control [ J ]. Cytopathology, 2003, 14 (6) : 343 -349.
  • 6Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Routhort MJ, et al. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods [J]. Cancer, 2006, 108 (4): 231-238.
  • 7Bavikattv NR, Michael CW. Cytologic features of small - cell carcinama on ThinPrep [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2003, 29 (1): 8-12.
  • 8吴广平,王恩华,李建华,付志民,韩硕,范玉.液基细胞学检查系统在肺癌患者痰液检查中的临床应用价值[J].中国肺癌杂志,2006,9(2):192-195. 被引量:15
  • 9徐进志,高俭,李野,杨春文.液基细胞学检测对痰脱落细胞诊断的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(15):1172-1174. 被引量:18
  • 10Rana DN, O'Donnell M, Malkin A, et al. A comparative study: conventional preparation and ThinPrep 2000 in respiratory cytology [J]. Cytopathology, 2001, 12 (6): 390-398.

二级参考文献29

  • 1李建华,付志民,吴广平,韩硕,范玉,周宝森,穆洪.液基细胞学检测对非妇科细胞标本肿瘤细胞诊断的意义[J].中国医科大学学报,2004,33(5):414-415. 被引量:24
  • 2翁俊良,黄杰雄,马琼凤.痰液沉渣切片和痰涂片检查诊断肺癌的比较性研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2004,7(4):354-356. 被引量:6
  • 3吴慰霖,季洪爱,王靖华,吉耘,周晓军,石群立,刘红娟,祁正茂,孙桂勤.液基细胞学在肺肿瘤检查中的探讨[J].医学研究生学报,2005,18(3):283-283. 被引量:17
  • 4吴爱如.宫颈癌的早期诊断[J].中国肿瘤,1994,3(3):11-12. 被引量:8
  • 5National Cancer Institute. The 1998 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginalcytological diagnoses. JAMA, 1989, 262:931.
  • 6Papillo JL, Zarka MA, John PL. Evaluation of the Thinprep Pap test in clinical practice: aseven months, 16314-case experience in northern Verrmont. Acta Gytologica, 1998, 42(1): 203.
  • 7Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquidbased cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a populationbased study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer, 1999,87:48
  • 8Bolick DR, Hellman DJ. Laboratory inplementation and efficacy assessment ofthe ThinPrep cervical cancer screenig system. Acta Cytol, 1998,42:209
  • 9Slolmon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System:terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA,2002,287(16):2114
  • 10Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman A, et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Proceccor. Am J Clin Pathol, 1994,101:215

共引文献43

同被引文献90

引证文献13

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部