期刊文献+

跨境双重上市与公司投资效率分析 被引量:4

跨境双重上市与公司投资效率分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用我国上市公司1993~2007年的9813个样本数据,采用数据包络分析方法探讨跨境双重上市能否提高公司的投资效率。研究结果表明,在A+H双重上市公司所涉及的九个行业中,制造业、电煤水业、信息技术业、银行保险业、房地产业、社会服务业的A+H公司的投资效率优于行业平均水平,占2007年底51家A+H公司的68.6%;但采掘业、建筑业、交通运输业的A+H公司的投资效率低于行业平均水平,占2007年底51家A+H公司的31.4%。大部分A+H公司的规模效率小于1但规模报酬递增,DEA表明这些公司应该继续扩大规模。大部分行业的上市公司(包括A+H公司)的效率均值都逼近或超过0.9,但各行业公司间的效率值比较接近。 Using the method of data envelopment analysis, we studied the data of 9813 listed companies in China from 1993 to 2007 to discuss whether cross-border dual listings can improve corporate investment efficiency. The results show that, in the nine industries concerned in A&H dual-listing, the average investment efficiency of the A&H companies belonging to the industries of manufacturing, electricity & water & coal, information technology, banking and insurance, real estate, social services, is higher than the corresponding industrial average level. The number of these A&H companies account 68.6% of all the A&H companies at the end of 2007 (51 companies). However, the average investment efficiency of the A&H companies belonging to the industries of excavating, construction, transportation, is lower than the corresponding industrial average level. The number of these A&H companies account 31.4% of all the A&H companies at the end of 2007 (51 companies). Furthermore, the scale efficiency of most A&H companies is less than 1 and the return to scale is increasing, which means that these companies should expand their scale. The average efficiency values of most industries (including A&H companies) vary around 0.9, but average efficiency values of all the companies (including A&H companies) in each industry are very adjacent.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第10期52-60,共9页 Securities Market Herald
基金 南开大学2007年度人文社会科学校内文科青年项目(NKQ07014) 教育部人文社科青年项目(07JC790063) 教育部人文社科基金项目(07JA630014)资助
关键词 跨境双重上市 海外上市 投资效率 A+H公司 Cross-Border Dual-Listings, Overseas Listing, Investment Efficiency, A&H Company
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Baker,H.K., J.R.Nofsinger, and D.G. Weaver. 2002. International Cross-listing and Visibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 37(3), pp: 495-521.
  • 2Alenxander, GJ., C.S.Eun, and S.Janakiramanan. 1987. Asset Pricing and Dual Listing on Foreign Capital Markets: A Note. The Journal of Finance. 1, pp:151-158.
  • 3Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science. 3(1(9), pp: 1078-1092.
  • 4Barzuza,M. 2006. Lemon Signaling in Cross-Listing. Working Paper.
  • 5Bradford, B.M., A.D.Martin, and A.M.Whyte. 2002. Competeitive and Information Effects of Cross-border Stock Listings. Journal of Financial Research. 3,pp: 399-413.
  • 6Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2, pp:429-444.
  • 7Doidge, C., G.A.Karolyi, K.V.Lins, D.P.Miller, and R.M. Stulz. 2007. Private Benefits of Control, Ownership, and the Cross-Listing Decision. Working Paper.
  • 8Farrell,M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 120(3), pp: 253-281.
  • 9Foester,S., and A. Karolyi. 1999. The Effects of Market Segmentation alld llliquidity on Asset Prices: Evidence from Foreign Stocks Listing in the U.S. Journal of Finance. 54,pp:981 - 1013.
  • 10Hargins, K. 2000. International Cross-listing and Stock Market Development in Emerging Economies. International Review of Economics and Finance. 9, pp:101-122.

二级参考文献54

  • 1王景.交叉上市、风险分散与溢出效应[J].证券市场导报,2007(6):63-70. 被引量:11
  • 2陈国进,王景.我国公司A+H交叉上市的溢出效应分析[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(4):36-42. 被引量:28
  • 3杨娉,徐信忠,杨云红.交叉上市股票价格差异的横截面分析[J].管理世界,2007,23(9):107-116. 被引量:25
  • 4Abdallah, A. 2005. Cross-Listing, Investor Protection, and Disclosure: Does It Make a Difference? The Case of Cross-Listing Versus Non-Cross-Listing Firms. Working Paper.
  • 5Alenxander, G.J., C.S.Eun, and S.Janakiramanan. 1987. Asset Pricing and Dual Listing on Foreign Capital Markets: A Note. The Journal of Finance. 1, pp: 151-158.
  • 6Ayyagari,M. 2004. Does Cross-Listing Lead to Functional Convergence? Empirical Evidence. Working Paper.
  • 7Baker,H.K., J.R..Nofsinger, and D.G. Weaver. 2002. International Cross- listing and Visibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 37(3), pp: 495- 521.
  • 8Barzuza,M. 2006. Lemon Signaling in Cross-Listing. Working Paper.
  • 9Benos, E., and M.S.Weisbach. 2004. Private Benefits and Cross-Listings in the United States. Emerging Markets Review. 5,pp:217-240.
  • 10Bhatnagar, C.S., and D.Bhatnagar. 2006. Stock Traversals and Arbitrage Possibilities: An Examination of Multiple Listings. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 12(2), pp:11-26.

共引文献2

同被引文献39

  • 1田利辉.海外上市、制度跃迁和银行绩效——“中银香港”案例分析[J].管理世界,2006,22(2):110-122. 被引量:21
  • 2Connor,T. G.O. Does Cross - Listing in the U.S. Cause Value? Working Paper,2005.
  • 3Durand, R.B., F. Gunawan, and A. Tarca. Does Cross - Listing Signal Quality? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 2006,2(2), pp : 48 - 67.
  • 4潘岳.中国公司双重上市行为研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007:153-173.
  • 5King,M. R. ,ad D. Segal. International Cross - Listing and the Bonding Hypothesis. Working Paper,200d.
  • 6King,M. R. ,and D. Segal. Are There Longer Horizon Benefits to Cross - Listing? Untangling the Effects of Investor Recognition, Trading and Ownership. Working Paper,2005.
  • 7Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Pohtical Economy, 1986,94 (3) :461-488.
  • 8Espen Eckbo, B., and S. Verma. Managerial Shareownership,Voting Power,and Cash Dividend Policy[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1994,1 (1) : 33-62.
  • 9Faccio,M., L. H. P. Lang,and L. Young. Dividends and Expropriation[J]. American Economic Review, 2001,91 ( 1 ) : 54-78.
  • 10Cronqvist, H., and R. Fahlenbrach. Large Shareholders and Corporate Policies [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009,22 (10) : 3941-3976.

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部