自由还是平等——诺奇克和罗尔斯的正义观比较

Freedom or equality——Comparison between Nozick's and Rawls' views of justice

分析了诺奇克和罗尔斯看待平等、国家的功能和分配问题上的不同观点,指出诺奇克主张的正义是尊重人们选择权的程序性的正义,罗尔斯主张的正义是有利于最少受惠者的实质性的正义。二者揭示了正义的两个性质。

This paper analyzes the different views of Nozick s and Rawls held on equality,functions of a country and distribution.It points out that Nozick s view of justice is a procedural one which respects people s right to choose,while Rawls view of justice is an essential one which benefits the few favored ones.Both the two views reveal the two natures of justice.