期刊文献+

第一大股东持股与高层管理人员变更:区间效应的实证研究

The Impact of the Controlling Shareholder on Top Management Turnover:Evidence from the Listed Companies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2006年上海证券交易所808家上市公司为样本,实证考察第一大股东持股对高管变更的影响。实证结果表明,公司绩效较好的情况下,第一大股东持股比例与公司高层管理人员变更之间存在显著的U型相关关系,在第一大股东持股较分散的区间,第一大股东持股对更换高管人员具有消极作用,在第一大股东持股集中的区间,第一大股东持股则具有积极的监督约束管理者功能;在不同的第一大股东持股区间,均不能验证第一大股东持股对经营不善公司管理层更换的积极作用。研究结果同时验证了股权制衡的监督制衡作用,其他大股东的持股与更换管理层呈现显著的正相关关系,而股权的国有性质与高管变更未呈现显著的相关关系。实证结果还表明,董事长和总经理两职兼任与高管变更负相关,独立董事制度对高管变更的影响不能发挥其正面监督作用。 This paper examines the relation between controlling shareholder and top management turnover of listed companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange in 2006. For excluding the impact of performance, we divided the whole sample companies into two groups: ordinary companies and special treatment companies. Our empirical results show that the largest shareholder has the negative and positive effects in different region of equity ownership, that is, we find a U-shaped relation between the largest shareholding's equity ownership and top management turnover. When the largest equity ownership is less than 37 percent of the whole share, the probability to change top management falls with the increase of the equity ownership of the largest shareholders, and when the proportion adds to 37 percent, the probability to change top executives increases. We also find that the equity ownership of other block shareholders is significantly positively related to the turnover of management.
作者 曾晓涛 谢军
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2009年第5期73-78,共6页 Business Economic Review
关键词 第一大股东 高管人员变更 股权制衡 国有控股 controlling shareholder, top management turnover, state holding, the balance of power among block shareholders
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fama, E., and Michael Jensen. Separation of Ownership and Control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983(26):301-325.
  • 2Fama, E.. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980 (88): 287-307.
  • 3Manne, H.. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1965 (73): 110-120.
  • 4Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. Large shareholders and corporate control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986 (94): 461-488.
  • 5Coughlan, Anne T., and Ronald M, Schmidt. Executive Compensation, Management Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1985(7).
  • 6Kaplan, S. N.. Top executive rewards firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the United States [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1994(102):510-546.
  • 7Grossman, S.J., and Hart O.D.. Takeover bids, the flee-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation [J]. Journal of Economics, 1980 (11):42-64.
  • 8沈艺峰,陈舒予,黄娟娟.投资者法律保护、所有权结构与困境公司高层管理人员变更[J].中国工业经济,2007(1):96-103. 被引量:34
  • 9南开大学公司治理评价课题组,李维安.中国上市公司治理评价与指数分析——基于2006年1249家公司[J].管理世界,2007,23(5):104-114. 被引量:57
  • 10陈璇,淳伟德.大股东对公司高层更换影响的实证分析[J].软科学,2006,20(2):134-139. 被引量:22

二级参考文献57

共引文献710

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部