期刊文献+

R&D项目组合选择的决策分析与思考——基于模糊集理论和启发调度视角 被引量:6

R&D project portfolio selection decision-making analysis and thinking-based on fuzzy set theory and inspired by scheduling perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前R&D项目的研究大多以数学规划、决策理论及评分方法来构建R&D项目投资组合的多准则模型。这些模型在有限范围内考虑是有效的,然而对于R&D项目的调度问题,是这些方法所不能解决的。本文将模糊集理论及启发调度的方法引入R&D项目组合的决策分析之中,以期寻求其最优解。最后用算例对R&D项目组合进行系统分析与研究。 Current R&D projects mostly math planning,decision-making theory and score ways are applied to build R&D project portfolio of multi-criteria model.At the limited scope of these models are effective,however,these methods can not resolve.In this paper,fuzzy set theory and search methods are inspired to scheduling of R&D project portfolio decision-making model,and with a view to seeking their optimal solution.Finally,examples of R&D project portfolio carried out systematic evaluation and empirical analysis.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第10期1518-1522,共5页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 河北省科技厅软科学研究资助项目(07457206D-6)
关键词 项目组合选择 模糊集理论 受限启发调度 R&amp D 决策分析 projects portfolio selection fuzzy set theory heuristics by scheduling R&amp D decision-making analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Platje A, Seidel H, Wadman S. Project and portfolio planning cycle, project - based management for multiproject challenge [ J]. Internal Journal of Project Management,1994, 12 (2) :100 - 106.
  • 2Dye L D, Penny J S. Project portfolio management: selecting and prioritizing projects for competitive advantage [ M ]. America: Center for Business Practices, 1999.
  • 3Roussel P A, Saad K N, Erickson T J. Third Generation R&D : managing the link to corporate strategy[ M ]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1991.
  • 4Schmidt R, Freeland J R. Recent progress in modeling R&D project - selection progress [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1992, 39 (2) : 189 - 201.
  • 5Schniederjans M, Santhanam R. A multi -objective constrained resource information system project selection method[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1993, 70:244-253.
  • 6Archer N P, Ghasemzadeh F. An integrated framework for project portfolio selection [ J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 1999, 17 (4) :207 - 216.
  • 7Baker N R. R&D project selection model: an assessment[ J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1974, 21(4) : 165 -171.
  • 8Liberator M J, Titus G J. The practice of management science in R&D project management [ J]. Management Science, 1983, 29(8) :962 -975.
  • 9Danila N. Strategic evaluation and selection of R&D projects[J], R&D Management, 1989, 19(1):47 - 60.
  • 10Baker N, Freeland J. Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods [ J ]. Management Science, 1975, 21 ( 10 ) : 1164 - 1175.

二级参考文献20

  • 1胡笙煌.主观指标评价的多层次灰色评价法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1996,16(1):12-20. 被引量:222
  • 2袁相瑾.技术项目价值的评估方法[J].科技管理研究,1996,16(2):18-19. 被引量:1
  • 3李光金,刘永清.DEA有效决策单元判断及排序的新方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1996,16(8):37-42. 被引量:18
  • 4杨忠直,张世英,李光泉.技术选择的评价与决策方法研究[J].中国软科学,1997(1):121-124. 被引量:8
  • 5魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988..
  • 6Roussel P A, Saad K N, Erickson T J. Third Generation R&D: Managing the link to corporate strategy [ M ]. Arthur D. Little, Inc. , 1991.
  • 7Schmidt R L, Freeland J R. Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1992,39 (2) : 189-201.
  • 8Baker N R. R&D project selection model:An assessment [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1974, 21 (4) :165-171.
  • 9Liberatore M J, Titus G J. The practice of management science in R&D project management[ J]. Management Science, 1983,29 (8) :962-975.
  • 10Danila N. Strategic evaluation and selection of R&D projects [ J]. R&D Management, 1989,19 ( 1 ) :47-60.

共引文献32

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部