期刊文献+

磁共振短返转时间序列在软组织肿瘤诊断中应用的研究 被引量:3

MRI Study in Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Tumors Using STIR Sequence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价磁共振短近转时间序列(STIR)在软组织肿瘤诊断中的作用。材料与方法:32例肿瘤均经SE和STIR序列扫描,比较两者图像的肿瘤对比度、信噪比和病理征象的检出率,评价对恶性肿瘤诊断价值。结果:肿瘤对比度在STIR序列上为0.7074±0.0470,在SET2WI上为0.3700±0.0546(P<0.01);信噪比在STIR序列上为10.246±3.052,在SET2WI上为23.374±10.040(P<0.01)。STIR与SET2WI比较。8例肿瘤范围在STIR上显示较大,肿瘤边缘不现则征STIR多检出9例,转移灶多检出2枚;STIR对恶性肿瘤诊断的敏感性较高。9例肿瘤在SET2WI上信号不均匀,在STIR上则为均匀高信号,2例肿瘤中央坏死在STIR上漏检,STIR的肿瘤信号缺乏一定的特异性。结论:STIR对肿瘤组织的敏感性较高,能使肿瘤对比度明显增加,显示肿瘤形态特点,对恶性肿瘤诊断和肿瘤分期有较高的价值。 Objective: To evaluate the role of MR shirt-TI inversion-recovery (STIR) pulse sequence in diagnosis of soft-tissue tumors. Materials and Methods:Thirty-two tumors were scanned by both SE and STIR sepuence, compered with the contrast of tumor, signal-difference-to-noise ratios (SD/Ns) and detecting rate of pathologic features, evaluating the value in diagnosis of malignant tumors. Results: The contrast of tumors wers 0.7074 ± 0.047 in the STIR and 0.3700 ± 0.0546 in the SE T_2WI (P < 0.01 ). The SD/Ns were 10.246 ± 3 .052 in the STIR and 23 .374 ± 10. 040 in the SE T_2WI. Compared STIR sequence with SE T_2WI, more than 9 cases of irregular margin of tumor and 2 lesion of metastises were revealed in the STIR. 9 cases of tumors were inhomogeneous signal intensity in the SE T_2WI, but were homogeneous high signal intensity in the STIR. 2 cases of cental necrosis of tumor were not found in the STIR. STIR sequence has nonspecificity of high signal intensity of tumors. Conclusion: The STIR has higher sensitivity for tumor tissue, can raise contrast of tumors and shows characteristic morphologic features of tumor, having higher value in diagnosis of malignant tumors and staging tumors.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 1998年第6期350-353,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 软组织肿瘤 磁共振成像 评价研究 Soft tissue neoplasms,Magnetic resonance imaging, Evaluation studies
  • 相关文献

同被引文献18

  • 1薛彩霞,王绍武,袁飞,宋清伟,宁殿秀.软组织肿瘤的多层螺旋CT、MR灌注成像初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(11):1135-1140. 被引量:16
  • 2田野.CT、MRI在鼻咽癌诊断与治疗中的作用[J].实用放射学杂志,1994,10(12):748-750. 被引量:5
  • 3Olmi P,Fallai C,Colagrande S,et al. Staging and follow-up of nasopharyngeal carcinoma:magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995,32:795-800.
  • 4Finelli DA, Hurst GC, Gullapali RP, et al. Improved contrast of enhancing brain lesions on postgadolinium, T1-weighted spin-echo images with use of magnetization transfer. Radiology, 1994,190: 553-559.
  • 5Erlemann R, Reiser MF, Peters PE, et al. Musculoskeletal neoplasms:static and dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 1989,171:767-773.
  • 6Yamamoto S, Takano H, Motoori K, et al. Detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: fast short time inversion recovery image compared with fat suppression, contrast enhanced T1 weighted spin echo images. Br J Radiol,2001,74:805-810.
  • 7Hilfiker P, Zanetti M, Debatin JF, et al. Fast spin-echo inversion-recovery imaging versus fast T2-weighted spin-echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Invest Radiol, 1995,30:110-114.
  • 8Shuman WP, Baron RL, Peters MJ, et al. Comparison of STIR and spinecho MR imaging at 1.5 T in 90 lesions of the chest, liver, and pelvis.AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1989,152: 853-859.
  • 9Oliveira A M, Nascimento A G. Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems[ J]. Skeletal Radiol , 2001, 30(10): 543 -559.
  • 10Koenig M, Kraus M, Theek C, et al. Quantitative assessment of the ischemic brain by means of perfusion-related parameters derived from perfusion CT[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(2): 431 -437.

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部