期刊文献+

术前行放疗增敏的Ⅰ_(B2)~Ⅱ_A期宫颈癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移情况的临床分析 被引量:4

Clinical Analysis of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Stage Ⅰ_(B2)~Ⅱ_A Cervical Cancer Treated by Pre-operative Sensitivity Enhancement of Radiotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析术前给予放疗增敏的ⅠB2~ⅡA期宫颈癌患者的盆腔淋巴结转移情况,探讨淋巴结转移规律、淋巴结转移与临床病理特征的关系及放疗增敏的临床意义。方法ⅠB2~ⅡA期的宫颈癌患者64例,术前给予放疗增敏后行广泛子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结切除术。根据病理结果记录淋巴结剔除个数及淋巴结转移的部位,计算淋巴结转移率。分析盆腔淋巴结转移与临床病理特征的关系。结果盆腔淋巴结转移8例,转移率为12.50%。术前行放疗增敏的盆腔淋巴结转移与患者年龄、FIGO分期、分化程度及组织类型无关(P>0.05)。8例有淋巴结转移的患者中,仅1组淋巴结转移的6例(75.0%),其分布为闭孔淋巴结4例(66.7%),髂内淋巴结1例(16.7%),髂外淋巴结1例(16.7%);同时有2组淋巴结转移的1例,为闭孔及髂内淋巴结;同时有4组淋巴结转移的1例,为闭孔、髂内、髂外及腹股沟深淋巴结。结论术前行放疗增敏的ⅠB2~ⅡA期宫颈癌患者中闭孔淋巴结是最常见的转移部位,其次是髂内、髂外淋巴结。术前给予放疗增敏可能降低宫颈癌患者的盆腔淋巴结转移率。 Objective To analyze the principles and its clinical significance of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with stageⅠB2~ⅡAcervical cancer treated by sensitivity enhancement of radiotherapy.Methods Sixty-four patients with stageⅠB2~ⅡA cervical cancer received sensitivity enhancement of radiotherapy before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.According to the pathological results,lymph node metastasis sites and metastasis rate were analyzed.Results Eight cases had lymph node metastases(12.5%) Pelvic lymph node metastases had no relationship with patientsage,FIGO stage,the degree of differentiation or pathological types (P 〉 0.05). Among 8 cases, only one group of lymph node metastasis had 6 cases(75.0% ), among which 4 cases were obtumtor lymph nodes(66.7% ), 1 case was internal iliac lymph node(16.67%), and 1 case was external iliac lymph node(16.7%). Two-group lymph node metastasis had 1 case,which was internal obturator and iliac lymph node; 4-group lymph node metastasis at the same time hod 1 case, which were obtumtor-intemal iliac/ external iliac-inguinal lymph nodes. Conclusion Obturator lymph node was the most common metastasis site in patients with stage Ⅰ82~ⅡA cervical cancer after sensitivity enhancement of radiotherapy, followed by internal iliac and external iliac lymph node. Pre-operative sensitivity enhancement of radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients may reduce the rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期627-629,共3页 Journal of China Medical University
关键词 宫颈癌 放疗增敏 淋巴结转移 cervical cancer sensitivity enhancement of radiotherapy lymph node metastasis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents : defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24( 14 ) : 2137-2150.
  • 2Sherman ME,Wang SS, Carreon J, et al. Mortality trends for cervical squamous and adenocarcinoma in the United States Relation to incidence and survival[ J ]. Cancer, 2005,103 (6) : 1258-1264.
  • 3Howe HL,Wu X,Ries LA,et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2003,featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/ Latino populations[J]. Cancer, 2006,107(8 ) : 1711-1742.
  • 4Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002 [ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005,55 (2) : 74-108.
  • 5连利娟,林巧稚.妇科肿瘤学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:304-306.
  • 6江涛,李隆玉,潘玫,万建萍.宫颈癌381例淋巴转移情况分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(7):873-874. 被引量:4
  • 7Sakuragi N, Satoh C, Takeda N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy[J]. Cancer, 1999,85(7 ) : 1547-1554.
  • 8温宏武,孙晓梅,刘喆,廖秦平.子宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移规律及其临床意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(4):281-283. 被引量:11
  • 9冯淑瑜,张彦娜,刘建刚.宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素及预后分析[J].癌症,2005,24(10):1261-1266. 被引量:71
  • 10王孝忠,刘富元,舒慧芳,陈燕辉,莫红梅,钟绍涛.宫颈鳞癌淋巴结转移特点、相关因素及预后分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(18):2489-2491. 被引量:5

二级参考文献33

  • 1张秀珍,付玉兰,赵西侠,杨栓雀,孙萍.宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移情况分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(2):232-234. 被引量:5
  • 2史玉林,牛菊敏,赵红,汪桂兰.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤72例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(11):669-671. 被引量:23
  • 3方素云,武昕.子宫颈癌(Ⅰ_a、—Ⅱ_b)术后淋巴结转移92例分析[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,1997,11(1):53-54. 被引量:6
  • 4Bolger BS, Dabbas M, Lopes A, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen level in patients surgically treated for cervical carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol,1997,65(2): 309-313.
  • 5Takeshima N, Hirai Y, Katase K, et al. The value of squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a predictor of nodal metastasis in cervical cancer [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 1998,68 (3): 263-266.
  • 6Monk B J, Cha DS, Walker JL, et al. Extent of disease as an indication for pelvic radiation following radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage Ⅰ B and Ⅱ A cervical carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol,1994,54( 1 ): 4-9.
  • 7Scambia G, Ferrandina G, Distefano M, et al. Is there a place for a less extensive radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer patients? [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001,83(2):319-324.
  • 8Sakuragi N, Satoh C, Takeda N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with stages Ⅰ B, Ⅱ A, and Ⅱ B cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy [J]. Cancer, 1999,85(7): 1547-1554.
  • 9Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, D'Andrea G, et al. Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study [J]. Cancer, 2000,88 (10):2267-2274.
  • 10Parazzini F, Valsecchi G, Bolis G, et al. Pelvic and paraortic lymph nodal status in advanced ovarian cancer and survival[ J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999,74 ( 1 ): 7- 11.

共引文献86

同被引文献39

  • 1李智伟,朱一迪,温放.早期宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结微转移免疫组化法检测及临床价值[J].中国医科大学学报,2009,38(12):933-936. 被引量:7
  • 2Teber D, GSzen AS, Cresswell J, et al. Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatecto- my: the Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature [J]. World J Urol,2009,27(5) :613-618.
  • 3Roque DR, Wysham WZ, Soper JT. The surgical management of cer- vical cancer: an overview and literature review [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,201g,69(7) :426-441.
  • 4Damiano R, Autorino R, Esposito C, et al. Stent positioning after ure- teroscopy for urinary calculi : the question is stil] open [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2004,46(3) : 381-387.
  • 5Alci E, Ustun M, Sezer T, et al. Comparison of patients in whom dou- ble-J stent had been placed or not placed after renal transplantation in a single center: a follow-up study [J]. Transplant Proc, 2015,47 (5) : 1433-1436.
  • 6Pengfei S, Yutao L, Jie Y, et al. The results of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi : a systematic review andmeta-analysis [J]. J Urol,2011,186(5) : 1904-1909.
  • 7Ringel A, Richter S, Shalev M. Late complications of ureteral stents [J]. Eur Urol,2000,38(1) :41-44.
  • 8Hao P, Li W, Song C, et al. Clinical evaluation of double-pigtail stent in patients with upper urinary tract diseases: report of 2685 cases [ J ]. J Endourol, 2008,22( 1 ) : 65-70.
  • 9Bostanci Y,Ozden E,Atac F,etal. Sinesession remov~of~rg~- ten encrusted ureter~ stents: combined endourologicM approach [J]. Urol Res,2011,40(5):523-529.
  • 10李相生,周纯武,戴景蕊,赵心明,蒋力明.多层螺旋CT诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2008,16(1):61-63. 被引量:35

引证文献4

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部