期刊文献+

依据共有STR基因座数判别全同胞关系 被引量:10

Full Sibling Identification Based on the Number of Matched STR Locus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立并探讨基于共有STR基因座数的全同胞关系判别方法。方法根据280对全同胞(fullsibling,FS)及2 003对无关个体(unrelated individual,UI)Identifiler系统15个STR基因座的分型结果,采用计数法计算全不同基因座数(A0)、半相同基因座数(A1)和全相同基因座数(A2),依据ITO法计算每对受试者的全同胞指数(FSI),应用判别分析得出基于共有基因座数或FSI进行全同胞及无关个体关系判别的Fisher判别函数,并比较其判别效能。结果全同胞对中的A1、A2和无关个体对中的A0、A1均呈正态分布,全同胞对中的A0和无关个体对中的A2均呈偏态分布。A1在两组人群中的分布差异无统计学意义(P>0.01)。同时采用A0和A2建立的全同胞及无关个体关系的判别函数分别为ZFS=0.99817A0+4.24442A2-12.77970和ZUI=2.014 56 A0+1.546 58 A2-7.280 76。采用上述判别函数进行全同胞及无关个体关系判别的平均错判率为0.049 0。上述判别函数的判别效能与基于FSI的判别函数的判别效能差异无统计学意义。结论可以采用Identifiler系统的共有基因座数进行全同胞及无关个体关系的判别,所建立的判别公式的判别效能与经典ITO法相近。 Objective To establish and evaluate the method of matched locus numbers in full sibling identification. Methods Two hundred and eighty full sibling(FS) pairs and 2003 unrelated individual(UI) pairs were genotyped with Identifiler system. The number of locus matched with 0 identical allele(A0), matched with 1 allele(A1) or matched with 2 alleles(A2) were counted and full sibling index(FSI) were calculated based on ITO method. Fisher discriminant functions were established based on the numbers of matched STR locus or FSI. Power of different Fisher discriminant functions was statistically analyzed. Results The distribution of A1 and A2 in FS group and that of Ao and A1 in UI group were in accord with normal distribution. Contrarily, Ao in FS group and A2 in UI group fitted to skew distribution, respectively. Difference of A1 distribution was not statistically significant in the two groups(P〉0.01 ). The established Fisher discriminant functions based on A0 and A2 for each group were ZFS=0.998 17 A0+4.24442 A2-12.77970 and ZUI=2.014 56 A0+1.546 58 A2-7.280 76, respectively, the average error probability of which was as low as 0.049 0. The power of discrimination for full sibling showed no statistically significant difference between ITO method and the established Fisher discriminant functions. Conclusion The number of matched STR locus in Identifiler system is a valuable method in full sibling identification. The discriminating power of the estab- lished Fisher discriminant functions based on the matched STR locus number is similar with that of classic ITO method in full sibling identification.
出处 《法医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2009年第5期341-344,共4页 Journal of Forensic Medicine
基金 中央级科研院所社会公益研究资助项目(GY0604)
关键词 法医遗传学 同胞关系 短串联重复序列 判别分析 共有基因座 forensic genetics sibling relations short tandem repeat discriminant analysis matched locus
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献64

  • 1王静,刘雅诚,唐晖,张庆霞,霍振义,秦颖.共有基因数在同胞鉴定中应用的研究[J].中国法医学杂志,2004,19(4):216-218. 被引量:17
  • 2台运春,陆惠玲,李海燕,唐振亚,宁忠.广东汉族人群15个STR基因座的遗传多态性[J].广东公安科技,2004,12(4):17-21. 被引量:9
  • 3台运春,陆惠玲,吕德坚,孙宏钰,陈森,姚亚楠,王会品.常染色体STR鉴定同胞的应用探讨[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(3):302-305. 被引量:12
  • 4Ehm GM, Wagner M. A Test Statistic to Detect Errors in Sib-Pair Relationships [J]. Am J Hum Genet, 1998, 62:181-188.
  • 5Michael Boehnke. Accurate Inference of Relationships in Sib-pair Linkage Studies [ J ]. Am J Hum Genet, 1997,61: 423 -429.
  • 6袁淑君 孟庆茂.数据统计分析-SPSS/PC+原理及应用[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1994.198-200.
  • 7Presciuttini S, Casarino L, Verdiani S, et al. Distribution of the number of alleles identical by state summed over several loci among full-sib pairs and unrelated individuals [ C ].In: George F. Sensabaugh, Progress in Forensic Geneics 8.Netherland: Elsevier Science, 2000. 88-90.
  • 8Tzeng CH, Lvou JY, Chen YR, et al. Determination of sibship by PCR-amplified short tandem repeat analysis in Taiwan[J]. Transfusion, 2000,40 (7) : 840-845.
  • 9Reid TM, Wolf CA, Kraemer CM, et al. Specificity of sibship determination using the ABI Identifiler multiplex system[J]. J Forensic Sci,2004,49(6) : 1262-1264.
  • 10Caenazzo L, Cerri N, Ponzano E, et al. Probability distribution of sibship determination with ABI Identifiler multiplex system using different software[J]. International Congress Series,2006,1288:492-494.

共引文献158

同被引文献58

  • 1刘开会,季安全,邱宁,王坚,王传海,郭燕霞,常彩琴,王占海,王建国,曹侠.肿瘤组织9个STR基因座及Amelogenin基因座突变[J].中国法医学杂志,2002,17(2):81-84. 被引量:13
  • 2王静,刘雅诚,唐晖,张庆霞,霍振义,秦颖.共有基因数在同胞鉴定中应用的研究[J].中国法医学杂志,2004,19(4):216-218. 被引量:17
  • 3台运春,陆惠玲,李海燕,唐振亚,宁忠.广东汉族人群15个STR基因座的遗传多态性[J].广东公安科技,2004,12(4):17-21. 被引量:9
  • 4台运春,陆惠玲,吕德坚,孙宏钰,陈森,姚亚楠,王会品.常染色体STR鉴定同胞的应用探讨[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(3):302-305. 被引量:12
  • 5Vauhkonen H, Hedman M, Vauhkonen M, et al. Evaluation of gastrointestinal cancer tissues as a source of genetic information for forensic investigations by using STRs[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2004,139 (2-3) : 159-167.
  • 6Poetsch M, Petersmann A, Woenckhaus C, et al. Evaluation of allelic alterations in short tandem repeats in different kinds of solid tumors-possible pitfalls in forensic casework[J]. Forensic Sci Int,2004, 145(1):1-6.
  • 7Vauhkonen H, Vauhkonen M, Sipponen P, et al. Correlation between the allelic distribution of STRs in a Finnish population and phenotypically different gastrointestinal tumours: a study using four X-chromosomal markers (DXS7423, DXS8377, ARA, DXS101) [J]. Ann Hum Genet,2004,68(6):555-562.
  • 8Pai CY, Hsieh LL, Tsai CW, et al. Allelic alterations at the STR markers in the buccal tissue cells of oral cancer patients and the oral epithelial ceils of healthy betel quid-chewers: an evaluation of forensic applicabil- ity[J]. Forensic Sci Int, 2002,129 (3) : 158-167.
  • 9Margiotta G, Coletti A, Lancia M, et al. Evaluation of allelic alterations in STR in different kinds of tumors and formalyn fixed tissues-possible pitfalls in forensic casework[J]. International Congress Series,2006,(1288):519-521.
  • 10Ceccardi S, Alu M, Lugaresi F, et al. Evaluation of reliability of STR typing in different types of cancerous tissues used for identification purpose[J]. International Congress Series, 2006, (1288) :672-675.

引证文献10

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部