期刊文献+

RECIST标准评价食管癌临床分期的化疗效果 被引量:9

Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Clinical Staging of Esophageal Cancer with RECIST Criteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以食管钡餐X线片和CT扫描结合的检测结果确定食管癌临床T分期的依据,探讨用于RECIST标准对食管癌化疗疗效的评价效果。方法选择未行手术和放疗的食管癌83例,根据食管钡餐X线片病变长度和CT扫描管壁厚度以及病变与周围组织器官的关系,将病变局部分为T1、T2a、T2b、T3a、T3b、T4期,并结合区域淋巴结及远处转移对应临床分期Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期。应用FLP方案化疗2个周期,比较食管钡餐X线片与CT扫描的食管病变长度的结果,按照RECIST标准评价食管癌化疗疗效。结果83例中T1、T2a、T2b、T3a、T3b、T4期分别为7、11、15、26、19、5例,对应临床分期Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期分别为13、37、33例。食管钡餐X线片与CT扫描的食管平均病变长度分别为(4.6±1.4)cm和(4.8±0.7)cm,差异有统计学意义(t=3.58,P<0.05)。化疗疗效CR 2例,PR35例,SD 34例,PD 12例,RR45%。结论RECIST标准更适用于评价食管钡餐X线片和CT扫描确定的食管癌临床分期的化疗疗效。 Objective To explore the clinical T staging of esophageal cancer according to the combined results of barium meal X-ray film and CT scan,in order to find the suitability of evaluation of chemotherapeutic efficacy in esophageal cancer with RECIST criteria.Methods 83 esophageal cancer patients with no treatments of surgery and radiotherapy were selected.According to the primary lesion length in barium meal,as well as the thickness of the esophageal wall and the invasion of the surrounding organs in CT scan,the primary lesions were divided into T1,T2a,T2b,T3a,T3b and T4,corresponding to clinical stagingⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ with evaluation of regional lymph nodes invasion and other metastases.After 2 cycles of chemotherapy using FLP regimen,primary lesion length in barium meal X-ray film and CT scan was compared with that of pre-therapy.The chemotherapeutic efficacy in esophageal cancer was assessed by RECIST criteria.Results Among the 83 cases,there were 7,11,15,26,19,the 5 cases respectively for T1,T2a,T2b,T3a,T3b and T4 stage,corresponding with 13,37 and 33 cases for clinical stagingⅡ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ.The mean length of primary lesions in esophagus taken by barium meals and CT scans was respectively(4.6±1.4) and(4.8±0.7)cm.There was statistical significance(t=3.58,P〈0.05).According to RECIST criteria,the chemotherapeutic results for these esophageal cancer patients were CR for 2 cases,PR for 35 cases,SD for 34 cases,PD for 12 cases,RR for 45%.Conclusion RECIST criteria is more suitable to the evaluation of the chemotherapy efficacy in esophageal cancer,the clinical staging was classified by the results of barium meals and CT scans.
作者 徐皖湘
出处 《肿瘤基础与临床》 2009年第4期343-345,共3页 journal of basic and clinical oncology
关键词 RECIST标准 食管癌 临床分期 化疗 RECIST criteria esophageal cancer clinical staging chemotherapeutic efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献42

  • 1陈智伟,廖美琳.RECIST标准在肿瘤治疗疗效评价中的应用[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(10):616-618. 被引量:175
  • 2戎铁华,林鹏,吴一龙.胸段食管癌淋巴结转移的临床研究(附220例分析)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994,10(3):242-244. 被引量:57
  • 3WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment [M].Geneva (Switzerland):World Health Organization,1979.
  • 4Duffaud F,Therasse P.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[J].Bull Cancer,2000,87(12):869-870.
  • 5James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring response in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,1999,91(6):523-528.
  • 6Mazumdar M,Smith A,Schwartz LH.A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline[J].J Clin Epidemiol,2004,57(4):358-365.
  • 7Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):179-181.
  • 8Werner-Wasik M,Xiao Y,Pequignot E,et al.Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy:tumor diameter,bidimensional product,and volume.A serial CT sean-based study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(1):56-61.
  • 9Prasad SR,Saini S,Sumner JE,et al.Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver:comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J].J Comput Assist Tomogr,2003,27(3):380-384.
  • 10Trillet-Lenoir V,Freyer G,Kaemmerlen P,et al.Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic coloreetal cancer:accuracy of the RECIST criteria[J].BrJ Radiol,2002,75(899):903-908.

共引文献292

同被引文献63

  • 1王修身,刘孟忠,张昌卿,蔡玲,崔念基.同期放化疗对食管癌患者血清血管内皮生长因子表达水平的影响——附43例临床资料分析[J].癌症,2006,25(11):1428-1432. 被引量:2
  • 2蒋向阳,安曙光,汪超,肖鑫,刘克,丁刚.奈达铂治疗晚期食管癌疗效观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(1):38-39. 被引量:3
  • 3孙燕,石远凯.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 4Zhang X, Shen L, Li J, et al. A phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus [J]. AM J Clin 0ncol,2008,31(1):29-33.
  • 5Taguchi T, Wakui A, Nabeya K, et al. A phase II clinical study of cisdiammine glycolato platinum, 254-S, for gastrointestinal cancers [J]. 254-S Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group [J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 1992,19(4):483-488.
  • 6Kana IM, Matsumoto S, Nishimura T, et al. Retrospective analysis of 27 consecutive patients treated with docetaxel/nedaplatin combination therapy as a second-line regimen for advanced esophageal cancer [J], Int J Clin 0ncol,2007,12(3):224-227.
  • 7Mauer AM,Kraut EH,Krauss SA,et al.Phase II trial of oxaliplatin,leucovor-in and fluorouracil in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.Ann Onco J,2005,16(8):1320-1325.
  • 8De Gramont A,Figer A,Seymonr M,et al.Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.J Clin Oncol,2000,18(16):2938-2947.
  • 9Mauer AM, Kraut EH, Krauss SA, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of oxaliplatin, leucovor - in and fluorouracil in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus [ J ]. Ann On- co L,2005,16 ( 8 ) : 1320-1325.
  • 10De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymonr M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first - line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer[J]. J Clin On- col ,2000,18 ( 16 ) :2938-2947.

引证文献9

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部