期刊文献+

咪达唑仑和氟哌利多辅助颈丛阻滞麻醉效果比较观察 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察比较咪达唑仑和氟哌利多辅助颈丛阻滞麻醉效果。方法:将甲状腺手术患者60例随机分为氟哌利多组和咪达唑仑组各30例,观察手术开始后5min及30min患者镇静程度,术后2h患者对手术过程的遗忘情况,以及术中血糖和皮质醇水平的变化。结果:手术开始5min及30min后,氟哌利多组警觉与镇静评分显著高于咪达唑仑组(P<0.05)。咪达唑仑组均有不同程度的顺行性遗忘,且70%为完全遗忘;而氟哌利多组仅27%为完全遗忘,两组比较,差异非常显著(P<0.01)。氟哌利多组术中血糖和皮质醇水平显著高于术前基础值(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论:咪达唑仑辅助颈丛阻滞麻醉术中镇静、镇痛效果满意。
机构地区 解放军 [
出处 《人民军医》 2009年第10期658-659,共2页 People's Military Surgeon
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Van der Bijl P, Roelofse JA. Disinhibitory reactions to benzodiazepines: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991,49 : 519-523.
  • 2Hall RC,Zisook S. Paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1981 ,11(Suppl 1) :995-1045.
  • 3Roelofse JA, Stegmann DH, Hartshorne J, et al. Paradoxical reactions to rectal midazolam as premedication in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1990,19:2-6.
  • 4Khan LC, Lustik SJ. Treatment of a paradoxical reaction to midazolam with haloperidol. Anesth Analg, 1997,85:213-215.
  • 5Thurston TA, Williams CG, Foshee SL. Reversal oI a paradoxical reaction to midazolam with flumazenil. Anesth Analg, 1996,83:192.
  • 6Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990,10:244-251.
  • 7Edewards M, Serrao JM, Gent JP, et al. On the mechanism by which midazolam causes spinally mediated analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1990,73:273-277.
  • 8Forster A, Gardaz JP, Surer PM, et al. Respiratory depression by midazolam and diazepam. Anesthesiology, 1980, 53: 494-497.
  • 9Power SJ, Morgan M, Chakrabarti MK. Carbon dioxide response curves following midazolam and diazepam. Br J Anaesth, 1983,55:837-841.
  • 10张鲁,岳云,郭桂琴,李建军,孙永海,贺赛琳.椎管内麻醉前肌注咪唑安定的遗忘作用与脑电变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1998,18(12):725-727. 被引量:23

共引文献138

同被引文献27

  • 1孙振涛,韩雪萍,王勇,徐广,田丹丹.舒芬太尼靶控输注辅助颈丛阻滞甲状腺手术效果[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2009,44(6):1227-1229. 被引量:2
  • 2刘存明,张国楼,王忠云,王灿琴,韩传宝,郝秀芬.咪唑安定辅助区域麻醉合适镇静深度及用量的探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):20-22. 被引量:122
  • 3欧阳才任,邓登和,彭美华,张临群.咪唑安定联合芬太尼对颈丛阻滞应激反应的预防[J].中国误诊学杂志,2006,6(7):1250-1251. 被引量:8
  • 4Mamede RC,Raful H.Comparison between general anesthesia and superficial cervical plexus block in partial thyroidectomies[J].Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol,2008,74(1):99-105.
  • 5Sternbach Y,Illig KA,Zhang R,et al.Hemodynamic benefits of regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy[J].J Vasc Surg,2002,35(2):333-339.
  • 6Umbrain VJ,van Gorp VL,Schmedding E,et al.Ropivacaine 3.75 mg/mL,5 mg/mL,or 7.5 mg/mL for cervical plexus block during carotid endarterectomy[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2004,29(4):312-316.
  • 7Bhagat H,Dash HH,Bithal PK,et al.Planning for early emergence in neurosurgical patients:a randomized prospective trial of low-dose anesthetics[J].Anesth Analg,2008,107(4):1348-1355.
  • 8Min JH,Chai HS,Kim YH,et al.Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction:remifentanil vs.lidocaine with esmolol[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2010,76(3):188-192.
  • 9Sindjelic RP,Vlajkovic GP,Davidovic LB,et al.The addition of fentanyl to local anesthetics affects the quality and duration of cervical llexus block:a randomized,controlled trial[J].Anesth Analg,2010,111(1):234-237.
  • 10Komatsu R,Turan AM,Orhan-Sungur M,et al.Remifentanil for general anaesthesia:a systematic review[J].Anaesthesia,2007,62(12):1266-1280.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部