期刊文献+

A Comparative Study on Post-intervention Use of Tirofiban or Enoxaparin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

A Comparative Study on Post-intervention Use of Tirofiban or Enoxaparin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of post procedure use of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲ a receptor in- hibitor (PGI) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing dual anti-platelet loading therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This was a prospective randomized grouping controlled study in 174 patients with ACS received aspirin 300 mg plus clopidogrel 600mg loading before PCI. After procedure, patients were randomized to intravenous tirofiban for 12 -24 hours (tirofiban group) or subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 days (enoxaparin group). Cardiac ischemic events, major bleeding complications, minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complications in both groups were investigated. Results Cardiac ischemic events, major bleeding complications, minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complications in tirofiban group were 8.0% , 3.4% , 6.8% , 3.4% , and 3.4% , respectively. In enoxaparin group, aforementioned event rates were 7%, 2. 3%, 6. 0%, 2. 3%, and 5.8%, respectively. No statistical significance was found between two groups. Conclusions In the setting of dual anti-platelet medication loading and PCI for the treatment of ACS, it is effective to use tirofiban or enoxaparin for aggressive post procedure antithrombotic therapy. It comes with a very low major bleeding complication rate. Use of GPI for 12 to 24 hours was comparable to use of LMWH for 5 days in efficacy and safety. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of post procedure use of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲ a receptor in- hibitor (PGI) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing dual anti-platelet loading therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This was a prospective randomized grouping controlled study in 174 patients with ACS received aspirin 300 mg plus clopidogrel 600mg loading before PCI. After procedure, patients were randomized to intravenous tirofiban for 12 -24 hours (tirofiban group) or subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 days (enoxaparin group). Cardiac ischemic events, major bleeding complications, minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complications in both groups were investigated. Results Cardiac ischemic events, major bleeding complications, minor bleeding complications, thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complications in tirofiban group were 8.0% , 3.4% , 6.8% , 3.4% , and 3.4% , respectively. In enoxaparin group, aforementioned event rates were 7%, 2. 3%, 6. 0%, 2. 3%, and 5.8%, respectively. No statistical significance was found between two groups. Conclusions In the setting of dual anti-platelet medication loading and PCI for the treatment of ACS, it is effective to use tirofiban or enoxaparin for aggressive post procedure antithrombotic therapy. It comes with a very low major bleeding complication rate. Use of GPI for 12 to 24 hours was comparable to use of LMWH for 5 days in efficacy and safety.
出处 《South China Journal of Cardiology》 CAS 2009年第3期132-136,共5页 岭南心血管病杂志(英文版)
关键词 acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention antithrombotic therapy anti-platelet therapy acute coronary syndrome percutaneous coronary intervention antithrombotic therapy anti-platelet therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1侯玉清,周忠江,黎建勇,贾满盈,吴平生,刘伊丽,滕中华.国产替罗非班治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的临床研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(1):34-36. 被引量:25
  • 2Elliott M. Antman,,Daniel T. Anbe,,Paul Wayne Armstrong, et al.ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive Summary[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.2004
  • 3Armstrong PW,Fu Y,Chang WC, et al.Acute coronary syn- dromes in the GUSTO-IIb trial: prognostic insights and impact of recurrent ischemia. The GUSTO-IIb Investigators[].Circulation.1998
  • 4Martel N,Lee J,Wells PS, et al.Risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis[].Blood.2005
  • 5Nipun Arora,Michael E. Matheny,,Carrie Sepke, et al.A pro- pensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure de- vices[].American Heart Journal.2007
  • 6Braunwald E,Antman EM,Beasley JW,et al.ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideli[].Circulation.2002
  • 7Steinhubl S R,Berger P B,Mann J T 3rd,et al.Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial[].The Journal of The American Medical Association.2002
  • 8Rabah,M,Mason,D,Muller,DW,Hundley,R,Kugelmas,AD,Weiner,B,Cannon,L,O’Neill,WW,Safian,RD.Heparin after percutaneous intervention (HAPI): a prospective multicenter randomized trial of three heparin regimens after successful coronary intervention[].Journal of the American College of Cardiology.1999
  • 9.
  • 10Theroux,P.,Jr,Alexander,J.,Dupuis,J.Upstream use of tirofiban in patients admitted for an acute coronary syndrome in hospitals with or without facilities for invasive management[].The American Journal of Cardiology.2001

二级参考文献8

  • 1Kimmelstiel C,Badar J,Covic L,et al.Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the platelet GPⅡb/Ⅲa inhibitor tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:implications for adjustment of tirofiban and clopidogrel dosage.Thromb Res,2005,116:55-66.
  • 2Ernst NM,Suryapranata H,Miedema K,et al.Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44:1187-1193.
  • 3Morrow DA,Sabatine MS,Antman EM,et al.Usefulness of tirofiban among patients treated without percutaneous coronary intervention (TIMI high risk patients in PRISM-PLUS).Am J Cardiol,2004,94:774-776.
  • 4Valgimigli M,Percoco G,Barbieri D,et al.The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemic complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty:the ADVANCE Trial.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44:14-19.
  • 5Wyss CA,Roffi M.Platelet Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Herz,2005,30:189-196.
  • 6The PRISM-PLUS investigators.Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,1998,338:1488.
  • 7The PRISM investigators.A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina.N Engl J Med,1998,338:1498.
  • 8Gibson CM,Dotani MI,Murphy SA,et al.Correlates of coronary blood flow before and after percutaneous coronary intervention and their relationship to angiographic and clinical outcomes in the RESTORE trial.Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis.Am Heart J,2002,144:130-135.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部