期刊文献+

天然气长输管道风险接受准则的研究进展 被引量:14

Study Progress in Risk Acceptance Criteria of Long-distance Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于天然气长输管道的风险因素分析,从个人风险、社会风险、环境风险三个方面论述了风险接受准则确定方法的研究与应用现状。个人风险接受准则的确定方法包括ALARP原则、AFR值、风险矩阵、AI值等;社会风险接受准则的确定方法包括F-N曲线、VIIH值、ICAF值、ALARP原则、风险矩阵等;而环境风险接受准则的确定,需要综合考虑生命损失、财产损失和环境破坏因素。指出了目前开展天然气长输管道风险接受准则研究与应用工作需要解决的问题和今后的重点研究方向。 Research and application actualities of determination method for risk acceptance criteria are described from Individual Risk(IR),Society Risk(SR) and Environments Risk(ER) based on risk factors analyses for long-distance natural gas transmission pipeline.Method to determine individual acceptance criteria covers over ALARP principle(As low As Reasonably Practicable),AFR(Annual Fatality Risk).Risk Matrices and AI(Aggregated Indicator);method to determine society risk acceptance criteria includes FN Curve.Value of Injuries and 111 Health(VIIH),Implied Cost of Averting a Fatality(ICAF),ALARP principle and Risk Matrices;and method to determine environments risk acceptance criteria needs to take comprehensively life loss,property loss and environment damage factor into account.Current issues to be solved in research and application of risk acceptance criteria and future key research direction to the field for long distance natural gas transmission pipeline are presented.
出处 《油气储运》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第10期6-9,共4页 Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
关键词 天然气管道 风险接受准则 ALARP原则 风险矩阵 研究进展 natural gas transmission pipeline,risk acceptance criteria.ALARP principle,risk matrix,research progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Moan T. Current trends in the safety of off shore structures, Proceeding of the seventh international offshore and polar engineering conferences, USA, 1998.
  • 2梅亚东,谈广鸣.大坝防洪安全评价的风险标准[J].水电能源科学,2002,20(4):8-10. 被引量:23
  • 3Faber M H. Risk and Safety in Civil Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland, 2001.
  • 4时振刚,张作义,薛澜.核能风险接受性研究[J].核科学与工程,2002,22(3):193-198. 被引量:29
  • 5李典庆,唐文勇,张圣坤.海洋工程风险接受准则研究进展[J].海洋工程,2003,21(2):96-102. 被引量:40
  • 6Kourmatzis I, Spouge J et al. Formal Safety Assessment (FSA). a mode foundation for marine safety, Marine forum 2000. Theshipping risk management forum, Athens, Greece, 2000.
  • 7IMO.Formal safety assessment, decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, MSC, 2000,72(16).
  • 8Ohtsubo H, Sumi Y. Committee report on risk assessment, Proceedings of the 14th international ship and offshore congress,Nagsaki, Japan, 2000.

二级参考文献30

  • 1李劲松,王重鸣.风险偏好类型与风险判断模式的实验分析[J].人类工效学,1998,4(3):17-21. 被引量:18
  • 2何贵兵.决策任务特征对风险态度的影响[J].人类工效学,1996,2(2):12-16. 被引量:13
  • 3Weinberg Alvin M 吕应中(译).第一核纪元[M].北京:原子能出版社,1996..
  • 4Ohtsubo H , Sumi Y. Committee report on risk assessment[ A]. Proceedings of the 14th international ship and offshore structures congress[ C]. Nagsaki, Japan,2000,2:1 - 41.
  • 5Moan T. Current trends in the safety of offshore structures[ A ]. Proceeding of the seventh international offshore and polar engineering conference[C]. USA, 1998, 420-427.
  • 6Bea R G. Reliability criteria for new and existing platforms[ A] .Offshore technology conference[ C]. OTC6312, 1990.
  • 7prEN 50126. Railway applications. The specification and demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Mintainability and Safety (RAMS)[S]. CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation.
  • 8Ditlevsen O. Risk acceptance criteria and/or decision optimization[ A]. 15th IABSE congress: structural engineering in consideration of economy, environment and energy[ C]. Copenhagen, 1996.
  • 9Bottelberghs P H. Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands[J ].Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000,71( 1-3 ) :59-84.
  • 10Harsanyi J C. Utilities, preferences and substantive goods[ M]. The United Nations University, 1992.

共引文献84

同被引文献111

引证文献14

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部