期刊文献+

不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者围术期T淋巴细胞亚群的影响 被引量:1

Effect of different anesthetic techniques on perioperative changes in T-lymphocyte subsets in patients with pulmonary cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同麻醉方法对肺癌患者围术期T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。方法30例择期行肺叶切除术的肺癌患者,随机分为两组,Ⅰ组为全麻组,Ⅱ组为硬膜外阻滞复合全麻组,每组15例。两组分别于麻醉前(T1)、麻醉后(T2)、术毕(T3)、术后1d(T4)、术后3d(T5)测外围血T淋巴细胞亚群的变化。结果两组患者麻醉后、术毕、术后1d时CD3、CD4、CD8及CD4/CD8均较麻醉前下降(P<0.05),术后3dⅡ组指标恢复接近麻醉前水平,Ⅰ组各项指标仍低于麻醉前水平。两组指标相比有显著差异性(P<0.01)。结论硬膜外阻滞复合全麻能减轻围术期的应激反应及麻醉药物对T淋巴细胞亚群的抑制,有利于胸科肿瘤患者免疫功能的及早恢复。 Objective To study the effects of different anesthetic techniques on perioperative changes in T-lymphocyte subsets in patients with pulmonary cancer. Methods 30 patients with pulmonary cancer need pulmonary lobectomy had been randomly average assigned into two groups, general anesthesia group (group Ⅰ),and general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia group (group Ⅱ ). Peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets were measured before induction (T1), after anesthesia(T2), end of operation(T3), 1d(T4), 3d(TS) after surgery. Results CD3 ,CD4,CD8 and CD4/CD8 all decreased in two groups at T2,T3 and T4 than T1 (P〈0.05).The index almost returned to the baseline values at T5 in group Ⅱ, while the group Ⅰ still low. The two groups ontrast had significant deviation(P〈0.01). Conclusion Epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthetic can reduce depression of T-lymphocyte subsets induced by surgical trauma and anesthesia, and is the anesthetic technique of choice for cancer patients undergoing major operation.
出处 《中国现代医药杂志》 2009年第10期5-7,共3页 Modern Medicine Journal of China
基金 广东省汕头市重点科技计划项目[汕府科(2007)76号]
关键词 全麻 硬膜外阻滞 肺癌 T淋巴细胞亚群 General anesthesia Epidural anesthesia Pulmonary cancer T-lymphocyte subsets
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Schneemilch CE, Hanenberg T, Ansorge S, et al. Effects of diffrent anaesthetic agents on immune cell function in vitro. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2005,22:616-623.
  • 2Nacon WR,Salhany KE.T-cell subset analysis of peripheral T- cell lymphomas by paraffin section immunohistology and correlation of CD4+/CD8+ results with flow cytometry[J].Am J Clin Pathol,1998,109(5):610-617.
  • 3Gnns LC, Coldenheim PD, Miller LG, et al. T-lymphocyte subsets in smoking and lung cancer:Analysis of monoclenal antibodies and flow cytometry[J].Am Rev Respir Dis,1982,126(2):265-269.
  • 4Shakhar G, Ben-Eliyahu S. Potential prophylactic measures against postperative immunosupperssion:could they reduce recurrence rates in oncological patients.Ann Surg Oncol,2003,10:972-992.
  • 5车润平.术后镇痛与免疫反应[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1999,20(2):80-83. 被引量:36
  • 6陈慰峰.医学免疫学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.197.
  • 7Syrjala H, Surcel HM, Ilonen J. Low CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratio on caute myocardial infarction.Clin Exp Immunol,1991,83:326- 328.
  • 8韦运杰,宫丽娅,苏秀宁,关小勇.利多卡因与布比卡因抑菌作用的临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(9):683-685. 被引量:15
  • 9Tanji K, Mizushima T, Natori S, et al. Induction by psycho-tropic drugs and local anesthetics of Dnak and GroEL proterins in Escherichia coli.Biochim Biophys Acta,1992,1129:172-176.
  • 10唐建国,薛张纲,缪长虹.局部麻醉药对红细胞免疫粘附功能的影响[J].中国麻醉与镇痛,2003,5(2):107-109. 被引量:3

二级参考文献7

  • 1薛昀,吴新民,张生锁,赵敏,严岩.左旋布比卡因和甲磺酸罗哌卡因体外的抑菌作用[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(4):293-294. 被引量:6
  • 2何并文,邹小英.局部麻醉药的非麻醉作用[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1996,17(1):22-25. 被引量:25
  • 3Ozer Z,Ozturk C,Altunkan AA,et al.Inhibition of bacterial growth by lignocaine in propofol emulsion.Anaesth Intensive Care,2002,30:179-182.
  • 4Tanji K,Mizushima T,Nsatori S,et al.Induction by psychotroplic durgs and local anesthetics of DnaK and GroEL proteins in Escherichia coli.Biochim Biophys Acta,1992,1129:172-176.
  • 5Kerenyi M,Batai R,Juhasz V,et al.Lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) has an antibacterial effect in vitro.J Hosp Infect,2004,56:75-76.
  • 6Chandan SS,Faoagali J,Wainwright CE.Sendsitivity of respiratory bacteria to lignocaine.Pathology,2005,37:305-307.
  • 7Rodrigues AG,Araujo R,Pina-Vaz C.Interaction of local anaesthetics with other antifungal agents against pathogenic Aspergillus.Int J Antimicrob Agents,2006,27:339-343.

共引文献87

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部