对埃德蒙·金“现象学的”比较研究方法论的质疑与检视——教师教育课程资源开发与运用目的的研究

The Query and Inspection on the "Phenomenological" Comparative Study Methodology of Edmund JoKing——A Research on the Aim of Exploitation and Application of CurriculumResource in Teacher Education

埃德蒙·金的名著《别国的学校和我们的学校——今日比较教育》被作为教师教育课程资源,在其被开发与运用的过程中,金的比较研究方法论"是什么"的问题被提了出来。金在该著作中提出"第三维研究"方法论,并指出它是"现象学的"。我们对金的比较研究方法论是"现象学的"提出质疑。金的比较教育方法论从其表达、论证、命名和概念来看是典型的波普尔式的。依据胡塞尔创立的最严格的现象学方法论对埃德蒙.金原初所与的方法论进行检视、质疑得到证实:埃德蒙.金的比较研究方法论并非是"现象学的"。

When Edmund JoKing＇s masterpiece , ＂Other Schools and ours-Comparative Studies for Today＂is used as an important curriculum resource in teacher education, ＂what King＇s comparative study methodology is＂ as a problem is put forward. In his book,King points out that his methodology is ＂the third dimensional research＂,which is ＂phenomenological＂. But we doubt King＂ methodology is ＂Phenomenological＂. Because from King＇s expression,argumentation,nomenclature and conception in his book,we find that his methodology is expressed in typical Popper＇s style. Using Husserl＇s pure phenomenology to inspect King＇s original giving methodology,our query is approved to be fight. King＇s research methodology in comparative education is not phenomenological.