期刊文献+

寡头下玉米种子销售返利模式与企业营销绩效的关联研究

Relations between Rebate Policy and Marketing Performance in Oligopolistic Corn Seed Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于文献研究与实地访谈,归纳了玉米种子市场企业营销绩效的主要影响因素,推导出寡头结构下返利模式对绩效起正向作用的研究假设,探讨了返利模式与营销绩效的内涵。实证部分以秋乐种业郑单958为例,从东北三省、西北等六区域收集了2006-2008年共422组有效数据进行统计分析,检验了除退货政策与品牌建设外,寡头下玉米种子销售返利与营销绩效具正向之关联性等结论。 Based on the literature review and on-site interviews, the paper generalized the main factors affecting the enterprise marketing performance in corn seed industry. The hypothesis was deduced that rebate policy has a positive role in improving the marketing performance of oligopolistic competition, and the structure of rebate model and marketing performance was discussed. With the empirical study on Zhengdan 958 of Qiule Company, the author collected 422 data from six areas of northeast China and northwest China during 2006- 2008. The statistical analysis showed that the corn seed market is monopolized and the role of rebate policy for marketing performance is positive (except the relationship between Return Policy and Brand-building).
作者 李继军
出处 《河南农业科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期39-43,共5页 Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences
关键词 返利模式 营销绩效 寡头 玉米种子 Rebate policy Marketing performance Oligopoly Corn seed
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1KotlerP.营销管理[M].11版.北京:清华大学出版社,2007.
  • 2Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J]. Management Science, 2002,48(8) : 992- 1007.
  • 3陈军,贺军辉.返利,用好这把双刃剑[J].投资与营销,2005(5):16-17. 被引量:1
  • 4陈竹.如何科学操作返利[J].知识经济,2002(10):60-63. 被引量:1
  • 5Emmons H, Gilbert S M. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods [J]. Management Science, 1998,44(2) : 276-- 283.
  • 6梅明平.经销商管理[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2006.
  • 7Pasternack B A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities[J]. Marketing Science, 1985, 4(2) :166--176.
  • 8佟屏亚.中国种业谁主沉浮[M].贵阳:贵州科学技术出版社,2002.
  • 9柴玮.种业市场营销环境变化分析及应对策略[J].中国种业,2007(12):12-13. 被引量:6
  • 10李善民,潘玉恒.经营经济学[M].2版,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Iyer G.A bargaining theory of distribution channels[J].Journal of Marketing Research,2003,(1):80-100.
  • 2Marvel H,Peck P.Demand uncertainty and returns policies[J].International Economic Review,1995,36(3):691-715.
  • 3Kreps D,Scheinkman A.Quantity precommitment and Betrand competition yield Cournot outcomes[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1983,14:326-337.
  • 4Pasternack.Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities[J].Marketing Science,1985(2):166-176.
  • 5Kandel E.The right to return[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1996(4):329-356.
  • 6Padmanabhan V I P,Png P L.Manufacturer's returns policies and retail competition[J].Marketing Science,1997,1:81-94.
  • 7Chu W.Demand signaling and screening in channels of distribution[J].Marketing Science,1992,11(4):327-47.
  • 8Cruz M.Channel players:product returns still a problem[J].CRN,2001,963:61-62.
  • 9Davis J.Minor adjustments,such as a simple return policy,can increase e-tail sales[J].Information World,2001,23 (7):78-91.
  • 10Davis S,Hagerty M,Gerstner E.Return policies and the optimal level of hassle[J].Journal of Economics and Business,1998,50(5):445-60.

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部