期刊文献+

土壤动物在污染评价中的作用、现行指标及胁迫环境下的耐受性 被引量:10

Role and Existing Indicators of Soil Animals in Assessment of Soil Pollution and Indication Characteristics from Their Tolerence Developed under Stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 土壤污染的动物评价方法需要改进与创新.论文从土壤动物功能群的生物学特性、生活习性及其在土壤养分循环中的作用等方面,综述了土壤动物在土壤污染评价中的应用;介绍了目前国际上通用的土壤动物评价指标和使用方法,包括种群特征、群落结构和生态区域模型;联系土壤污染状况和趋势,阐述了土壤动物对污染胁迫的耐受性及其对现行土壤污染评价方法的影响,并在可塑型适应和组成型适应上探讨了土壤动物耐受性产生的遗传学机理与生物学指标. Current methods for assessment of soil pollution using soil animals need to be improved or innovated. In this paper, from the aspects of biological characteristics and living habits of soil animal functional groups and their roles in soil nutrient cycling, the application of soil animals to assess soil pollution was reviewed. The current generic bio -indicators and methods for assessment of soil pollution using soil animals involving population characteristics, community structure parameters and ecological region models were introduced. Tolerance of soil animals under pollution stress and its influence on assessment of soil pollution were elucidated. Based on acclimation and adaptation of soil animals, the genetic mechanisms and bio-indicators of animal tolerance to soil pollution were discussed.
作者 柯欣 骆永明
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 2009年第4期457-466,共10页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.40671105 No.40432005) 中国科学院创新工程方向项目(No.kzcx2-yw-404)
关键词 土壤质量 指示生物 功能群 生物响应 适应性 soil pollution indicator organism function groups bio-indicator adaptation
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1Aldenberg T, Slob W. 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 25( 1 ): 48-63.
  • 2Bengtsson G, Rundgren S. 1988. The Gusum case: a brass mill and the distribution of soil Colembola [J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66:1518-1526.
  • 3Benton M J, Diamond S A, Guttman S I. 1994. A genetic and morphometric comparison of Helisoma trivolvis and Gambusia holbrooki from clean and contaminated habitats[ J ]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 29 ( 1 ): 20- 37.
  • 4Blanck H A. 2002. Critical review of procedures and approaches used for assessing pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) in biotic communities [ J ]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8(5): 1003-1034.
  • 5Bouche M B. 1992. Earthworm species and ecotoxicological studies [A]. // Greig-Smith P W, Becker H, Edwards P J, Heimbach F. Ecotoxicology of Earthworms [ C ]. London: Intercept Ltd, 20-35.
  • 6Brussaard L. 1998. Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem processes [ J ]. Applied Soil Ecology, 9 ( 1-3 ): 123-135.
  • 7Chen J Z, Hebert P D N. 1999. Terminal branch haplotype analysis: a novel approach to investigate newly arisen variants of mitochondrial DNA in natural populations[ J ]. Mutation Research/ DNA Repair, 434(3): 219-231.
  • 8Chdstensen E R, Nyholm N. 1984. Ecotoxicological assays with algae: Weibull dose-response curves [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 18(9): 713-718.
  • 9Crommentuijn T, Doodeman C J A M, Koomekamp A, Van Gestel C A M. 1997. Life-table study with the springtail Folsomia cand/da(Willem)exposed to cadmium, chlorpyrifos and triphenyltin hydroxide [A]. //Van Straalen N M, Lφkke H. Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminants in Soil [C]. London: Academic Press, 275- 291.
  • 10Day A J, Hawkins A J S, Visootiviseth P. 2000. The use of altozymes and shell morphology to distinguish among sympatric species of the rock oyster Saccostrea in Thailand [ J ]. Aquaculture, 187(1-2): 51-72.

同被引文献174

引证文献10

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部