期刊文献+

测验等值:从IRT到MIRT 被引量:3

Test Equating:From IRT to MIRT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 等值作为保证测验公平性的技术手段,一直是测验理论研究的重要方面。MIRT理论的发展证明了题目和测验是复杂的,传统的单维模型已经不能满足对人和题目/测验之间关系的探讨需求。目前MIRT等值研究主要有两种取向,其中一种取向是研究多维数据对IRT等值会产生什么样的影响;第二种取向是通过开发新的计算方法和计算工具研究MIRT等值过程。MIRT等值研究最重要的是对等值方法和过程实现的研究,目前已取得一些进展,在进行这些研究的过程中最重要的考虑因素是控制其误差影响因素。 As a technology to ensure the test equity, test equating is the important aspect of the test theory research. The development of MIRT proved the item and the test is complicated, the traditional unidimentional model have not been satisfied with the need of exploring the relationship of people and item/test. Now MIRT research have two tendency, one is to investigate how the multidimensional data have effect on the IRT equating, another is to study MIRT equating procedure by developing new calculating method and instrument. The key of MIRT equating research is to study the equating method and how to realize the procedure, which have some advances. In the process of these research, the most important factor is to consider fully how to control the error.
作者 谢晶 张厚粲
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2009年第5期67-71,共5页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 测验等值 MIRT IRT 因素分析 误差 test equating MIRT IRT factor analysis error
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Petersen N S, Cook L L, Stocking M L. IRT versus conventional equating methods: A comparative study of scale stability. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1983,8(2) : 137 - 156.
  • 2Livingston S L, Dorans N J, Wright N K. What combination of sampfing and equating methods works best? Applied Measurement in Edueationt, 1990,3 : 73 - 95.
  • 3Skaggs G, Lissitz R W. IRT test equating: Relevant issues and a review of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 1986,56(4) :495 - 529.
  • 4Hambleton R K, Swaminathan H, Rogers H J. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1991.
  • 5Kolen M J, Brennan R L. Test Equating, scaling and linking: Methods and practices.2nd ed. New York: Springer,2004.
  • 6McDonald R P. A basis for multidimensional item response theory. Apphed Psychological Measurement, 2000, 24 (2): 99 - 114.
  • 7Reckase M D. The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Apphed Psychological Measurement, 1997, 21 (1):25- 36.
  • 8Reckase M D. The difficulty of test items that measure more than one ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1985, 9 (4) :401 - 412.
  • 9Reckase M D. The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997, 21 (1) :25 - 36.
  • 10Yao L H, Schwarz R D. A Multidimensional Partial Credit Model with associated item and test statistics: An application to Mixed- Format Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2006,30(6) :469 - 492.

同被引文献59

  • 1对高考试题的统计分析[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1981(5):65-73. 被引量:8
  • 2吴志明,张厚粲,杨立谦.结构化面试中的评分一致性问题初探[J].应用心理学,1997,3(2):8-14. 被引量:28
  • 3戴海崎 张峰 陈雪枫.心理与教育测量[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2001.117-118,282.
  • 4Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
  • 5B6guin, A. A., Hanson, B. A., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000, April) Effect of multidimensionality on separate and concurrent estimation in IRT equating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.
  • 6Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
  • 7Briggs, D. C., & Weeks, J. P. (2009). The impact of vertical scaling decisions on growth interpretations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4), 3-14.
  • 8Chin, T. Y., Kim, W., & Nering, M. L. (2006, April). Five statistical factors that influence IRT vertical scaling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • 9Custer, M., Omar, M. H., & Pomplun, M. (2006). Vertical scaling with the Rasch model utilizing default and tight convergence settings with WlNSTEPS and BILOG MG. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 133-149.
  • 10Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57(3), 423-436.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部